Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting janusgraph-cassandra

sjudeng <sju...@...>


Samant has said he should be able to continue working on this effort. The current proposal is to refactor into the following structure.

├─ janusgraph-cassandra-parent/
│   ├── astyanax
│   ├── cql
│   ├── core
│   ├── embedded
│   ├── test
│   ├── thrift

+1 for me. I think it's a step in the right direction and I'd hate to see the work already done on this go to waste.

Jason, is this something that needs a separate vote thread or can the work/PR just move forward?

Samant, What do you think about Ted's question above?

On Saturday, June 17, 2017 at 12:28:41 PM UTC-5, sjudeng wrote:
Hi Samant,

Are you still able to move forward with getting your work on this submitted? If so do you want to call a vote on the proposed refactoring or do you want me to? One way or another I think the refactoring is definitely needed. It came up in a recent PR where configuration needed to be duplicated in janusgraph-cassandra and janusgraph-cql because of the current state of things.


Join to automatically receive all group messages.