|
Re: [DISCUSS] JanusGraph 0.3.2 release
I have reviewed and added #1601 into milestone. We should then figure our why those tests are falling.
I am not sure if #1406 will be fixed soon. If it is then I would like to get it into the
I have reviewed and added #1601 into milestone. We should then figure our why those tests are falling.
I am not sure if #1406 will be fixed soon. If it is then I would like to get it into the
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#1116
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] JanusGraph 0.3.2 release
As an FYI. I found some changes in 0.3 that will make my release notes not entirely accurate for the 0.3.2 and 0.4.0 releases. My plan is to open a PR updating RELEASING.md with my notes. I'll do my
As an FYI. I found some changes in 0.3 that will make my release notes not entirely accurate for the 0.3.2 and 0.4.0 releases. My plan is to open a PR updating RELEASING.md with my notes. I'll do my
|
By
Chris Hupman <chris...@...>
·
#1115
·
|
|
[DISCUSS] JanusGraph 0.3.2 release
Hi everyone,
I am going to make "0.3.2" release PR after conflicts in #1609 is resolved and the PR is merged.
After that I am going to finalize artifacts, docs and start a voting process.
I am going
Hi everyone,
I am going to make "0.3.2" release PR after conflicts in #1609 is resolved and the PR is merged.
After that I am going to finalize artifacts, docs and start a voting process.
I am going
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#1114
·
|
|
[RESULT][VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.3 release
This vote is now closed with a total of 6 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are:
BINDING VOTES:
+1 (3 -- Jason Plurad, Florian Hockmann, Alex Patrikalakis)
0 (0)
-1 (0)
NON-BINDING VOTES:
+1 (3
This vote is now closed with a total of 6 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are:
BINDING VOTES:
+1 (3 -- Jason Plurad, Florian Hockmann, Alex Patrikalakis)
0 (0)
-1 (0)
NON-BINDING VOTES:
+1 (3
|
By
Chris Hupman <chris...@...>
·
#1113
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.3 release
Binding vote +1. Good job on the docker and stability/quality improvements.
Binding vote +1. Good job on the docker and stability/quality improvements.
|
By
Alexander Patrikalakis <amcpatr...@...>
·
#1112
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.3 release
* Imported KEYS file and verified GPG signatures on pre-built distribution files
* Downloaded source code archive and built a distribution
* Unzipped the pre-built distribution and did manual testing
* Imported KEYS file and verified GPG signatures on pre-built distribution files
* Downloaded source code archive and built a distribution
* Unzipped the pre-built distribution and did manual testing
|
By
Jason Plurad <plu...@...>
·
#1111
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.3 release
I just tested to build the docker image for janusgraph and created a PR. The image works perfectly with my changes in PR https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph-docker/pull/17.
My VOTE is +1.
I just tested to build the docker image for janusgraph and created a PR. The image works perfectly with my changes in PR https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph-docker/pull/17.
My VOTE is +1.
|
By
Jan Jansen <faro...@...>
·
#1110
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.3 release
We have 3 +1 votes, however we have only 1 +1 votes from a TSC member, which falls short of the 3 required for the release.
Chris Hupman
Oleksandr Porunov
Florian Hockmann *
* denotes TSC member
Due
We have 3 +1 votes, however we have only 1 +1 votes from a TSC member, which falls short of the 3 required for the release.
Chris Hupman
Oleksandr Porunov
Florian Hockmann *
* denotes TSC member
Due
|
By
Chris Hupman <chris...@...>
·
#1109
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Support of CQL backend for Spark #985
I think that we should not remove support for Thrift for 0.4.0 as we only gain full support for the successor CQL in 0.4.0 with the added support for Spark (PR #1436). I think we should first
I think that we should not remove support for Thrift for 0.4.0 as we only gain full support for the successor CQL in 0.4.0 with the added support for Spark (PR #1436). I think we should first
|
By
Florian Hockmann <f...@...>
·
#1108
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Support of CQL backend for Spark #985
I was looking into libthrift again and realized I did a bad job keeping up with us. Were most of the issues figured out in PR 1400 and PR 1436? What else is there to do before we can remove libthrift
I was looking into libthrift again and realized I did a bad job keeping up with us. Were most of the issues figured out in PR 1400 and PR 1436? What else is there to do before we can remove libthrift
|
By
Chris Hupman <chris...@...>
·
#1107
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.3 release
I have downloaded .tar.zip, extracted it, built jars, included into my personal project with different integration tests. Ran integration tests. All tests have passed except some tests which require
I have downloaded .tar.zip, extracted it, built jars, included into my personal project with different integration tests. Ran integration tests. All tests have passed except some tests which require
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#1106
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.3 release
I skimmed over the docs and everything looks as expected.
The changelog and the release on GitHub also look good.
I also downloaded the zip archive, extracted it, started JanusGraph with
I skimmed over the docs and everything looks as expected.
The changelog and the release on GitHub also look good.
I also downloaded the zip archive, extracted it, started JanusGraph with
|
By
Florian Hockmann <f...@...>
·
#1105
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.3 release
Thanks for catching that. It's been updated.
Thanks for catching that. It's been updated.
|
By
Chris Hupman <chris...@...>
·
#1104
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.3 release
Hello Chris,
Right now a small mistake in https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/tag/v0.2.3
It says: Version 0.2.2 (October 9, 2018)
I assume it should be: Version 0.2.3 (May 21, 2019)
Hello Chris,
Right now a small mistake in https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/tag/v0.2.3
It says: Version 0.2.2 (October 9, 2018)
I assume it should be: Version 0.2.3 (May 21, 2019)
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#1103
·
|
|
[VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.3 release
Hello,
We are happy to announce that JanusGraph 0.2.3 is ready for release.
The release artifacts can be found at this location:
https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/tag/v0.2.3
A
Hello,
We are happy to announce that JanusGraph 0.2.3 is ready for release.
The release artifacts can be found at this location:
https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/tag/v0.2.3
A
|
By
Chris Hupman <chris...@...>
·
#1102
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.2.3 release and 0.3 branch
I already figured out the fix and submitted a PR, https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/1596. The tests in .travis.yml.cassandra are all passing and the PR is pretty small. If anyone has time
I already figured out the fix and submitted a PR, https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/1596. The tests in .travis.yml.cassandra are all passing and the PR is pretty small. If anyone has time
|
By
Chris Hupman <chris...@...>
·
#1101
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.2.3 release and 0.3 branch
Chris, thank you for this work! Sure, take as much time as you need!
Chris, thank you for this work! Sure, take as much time as you need!
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#1100
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.2.3 release and 0.3 branch
I will not be able to submit for a vote today. I realized I needed to do additional testing on Cassandra versions, using travis.yml.cassandra, and I got some failures in cql for version 3.11.0. I'm
I will not be able to submit for a vote today. I realized I needed to do additional testing on Cassandra versions, using travis.yml.cassandra, and I got some failures in cql for version 3.11.0. I'm
|
By
Chris Hupman <chris...@...>
·
#1099
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.2.3 release and 0.3 branch
I'm hoping to submit for a vote on Monday. One piece of advice that I wish I had done is to pick a cutoff date where you'll push everything out to the next release so you don't have to worry about
I'm hoping to submit for a vote on Monday. One piece of advice that I wish I had done is to pick a cutoff date where you'll push everything out to the next release so you don't have to worry about
|
By
Chris Hupman <chris...@...>
·
#1098
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.2.3 release and 0.3 branch
Notice, that PRs 1547 and 1588 are targeting master branch (which is 0.4.0 release). If you want those PRs to be included into 0.3.2 and 0.4.0 releases you should rebase your PRs and target 0.3
Notice, that PRs 1547 and 1588 are targeting master branch (which is 0.4.0 release). If you want those PRs to be included into 0.3.2 and 0.4.0 releases you should rebase your PRs and target 0.3
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#1097
·
|