|
Re: JanusGraph - OLAP - YARN (Hadoop 3.x)
Hey, check if you have spark-unsafe.jar in your classpath.
Hey, check if you have spark-unsafe.jar in your classpath.
|
By
sha...@...
·
#1185
·
|
|
Re: New committer: Pavel Ershov
Congrats, Pavel! Thank you very much for your contributions!
Congrats, Pavel! Thank you very much for your contributions!
|
By
Misha Brukman <mbru...@...>
·
#1184
·
|
|
Re: New TSC member: Oleksandr Porunov
Congrats, Oleksandr!
Jerry
Congrats, Oleksandr!
Jerry
|
By
Jerry He <jerr...@...>
·
#1183
·
|
|
Re: New committer: Pavel Ershov
Congrats Pavel!
Jerry
By
Jerry He <jerr...@...>
·
#1182
·
|
|
Re: Support for Partitioned Vertices in JanusGraphHadoop for OLAP queries
Thanks for your reply, I'm currently weighing the option of simply bucketing by time vs. partitioning and then implementing partitioned vertex support in OLAP. We are using an HBase backend via
Thanks for your reply, I'm currently weighing the option of simply bucketing by time vs. partitioning and then implementing partitioned vertex support in OLAP. We are using an HBase backend via
|
By
kestin...@...
·
#1176
·
|
|
Re: New TSC member: Oleksandr Porunov
Congratulations, Oleksandr! Thank you for your extensive contributions to JanusGraph and welcome to the TSC!
Congratulations, Oleksandr! Thank you for your extensive contributions to JanusGraph and welcome to the TSC!
|
By
Misha Brukman <mbru...@...>
·
#1178
·
|
|
Re: New TSC member: Oleksandr Porunov
Congratulations, Oleksandr!
Thanks,
Abhay
Congratulations, Oleksandr!
Thanks,
Abhay
|
By
Abhay Pandit <abha...@...>
·
#1181
·
|
|
Re: New committer: Pavel Ershov
That's great!!
Congrats Pavel
That's great!!
Congrats Pavel
|
By
Abhay Pandit <abha...@...>
·
#1180
·
|
|
New committer: Pavel Ershov
On behalf of the JanusGraph Technical Steering Committee (TSC), I'm pleased to welcome a new committer on the project!
Pavel Ershov has been a solid contributor. He already made a significant number
On behalf of the JanusGraph Technical Steering Committee (TSC), I'm pleased to welcome a new committer on the project!
Pavel Ershov has been a solid contributor. He already made a significant number
|
By
"Florian Hockmann" <f...@...>
·
#1179
·
|
|
New TSC member: Oleksandr Porunov
On behalf of the JanusGraph Technical Steering Committee (TSC), I'm pleased to welcome a new Technical Steering Committee member on the project!
Oleksandr Porunov is one of the most active
On behalf of the JanusGraph Technical Steering Committee (TSC), I'm pleased to welcome a new Technical Steering Committee member on the project!
Oleksandr Porunov is one of the most active
|
By
"Florian Hockmann" <f...@...>
·
#1177
·
|
|
Re: [MEETUP] JanusGraph Community Online Meetup August 7
Hello,
Meetup #2 is almost here! If you haven't signed up already but are still interested, the link can be found here: https://training.experoinc.com/janus-meetup-august7/. We're looking forward to
Hello,
Meetup #2 is almost here! If you haven't signed up already but are still interested, the link can be found here: https://training.experoinc.com/janus-meetup-august7/. We're looking forward to
|
By
Ted Wilmes <twi...@...>
·
#1175
·
|
|
Re: Support for Partitioned Vertices in JanusGraphHadoop for OLAP queries
I'm not aware of anyone working on this right now, but supernodes are definitely a big problem for graph databases, including JanusGraph, so any improvements in that area would be a great help for
I'm not aware of anyone working on this right now, but supernodes are definitely a big problem for graph databases, including JanusGraph, so any improvements in that area would be a great help for
|
By
Florian Hockmann <f...@...>
·
#1174
·
|
|
Support for Partitioned Vertices in JanusGraphHadoop for OLAP queries
Hey there,
I have been working with JanusGraph recently and unfortunately the dataset that I am dealing with is susceptible to supernodes (10+ mil edges into a single vertex). It seems that
Hey there,
I have been working with JanusGraph recently and unfortunately the dataset that I am dealing with is susceptible to supernodes (10+ mil edges into a single vertex). It seems that
|
By
kestin...@...
·
#1173
·
|
|
Re: Not able to 'addEdge' to 'CacheVertex'
Teena:
How do you fix this problem? I'm boring about it.
Teena:
How do you fix this problem? I'm boring about it.
|
By
bodd...@...
·
#1172
·
|
|
Re: Replacing EntryList by an iterable type
Hi, Hieu
I am not aware of any special reason it is such way as you point out. Feel free to propose any improvement or new design.
The thing I can think of is that you probably would need to
Hi, Hieu
I am not aware of any special reason it is such way as you point out. Feel free to propose any improvement or new design.
The thing I can think of is that you probably would need to
|
By
Jerry He <jerr...@...>
·
#1171
·
|
|
Replacing EntryList by an iterable type
When I look at the OrderedKeyValueStoreAdapter class, in methods getSlice() or getSlices(), objects of type RecordIterator<KeyValueEntry> are converted to objects of type EntryList
When I look at the OrderedKeyValueStoreAdapter class, in methods getSlice() or getSlices(), objects of type RecordIterator<KeyValueEntry> are converted to objects of type EntryList
|
By
Hieu Nguyen <ntrh...@...>
·
#1170
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Don't use Scroll API for ElasticSearch requests
Hi !
I have strated to look at this point last week.
I haven't code anything, but this topic interests me.
In my searchs, the only problem using "search_after" wich is recommended now by elasticsearch
Hi !
I have strated to look at this point last week.
I haven't code anything, but this topic interests me.
In my searchs, the only problem using "search_after" wich is recommended now by elasticsearch
|
By
remi.g...@...
·
#1169
·
|
|
Re: [TSC ACTION REQUIRED] Unblock 0.4 branch
Sorry about that; I've fixed the branch protection rule so you should be good to go now.
Sorry about that; I've fixed the branch protection rule so you should be good to go now.
|
By
Misha Brukman <mbru...@...>
·
#1168
·
|
|
[TSC ACTION REQUIRED] Unblock 0.4 branch
Hello,
There is a branch protraction on `0.4` branch which should be removed. Please, remove branch protraction on `0.4` branch.
Currently the branch `0.4` is inconsistent with `0.3` and `master`
Hello,
There is a branch protraction on `0.4` branch which should be removed. Please, remove branch protraction on `0.4` branch.
Currently the branch `0.4` is inconsistent with `0.3` and `master`
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#1167
·
|
|
[MEETUP] JanusGraph Community Online Meetup August 7
Hello,
I would like to announce the second online JanusGraph community meetup. We have a great lineup of sessions that will be given by JanusGraph community members and lots of time for interactive
Hello,
I would like to announce the second online JanusGraph community meetup. We have a great lineup of sessions that will be given by JanusGraph community members and lots of time for interactive
|
By
Ted Wilmes <twi...@...>
·
#1166
·
|