|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.1 release
+1
Downloaded the binary zip. Checked the signature. Good.
Unzip it. Looked at the directories and files. Good.
Ran transactions and queries against HBase 1.2.6 and Solr 6.3.0 backend. Good.
+1
Downloaded the binary zip. Checked the signature. Good.
Unzip it. Looked at the directories and files. Good.
Ran transactions and queries against HBase 1.2.6 and Solr 6.3.0 backend. Good.
|
By
Jerry He <jerr...@...>
·
#664
·
|
|
Re: cassandra with ldap authentication
Thanks for tip ... and also for a very clear & detailed explanation about license implication
Thanks for tip ... and also for a very clear & detailed explanation about license implication
|
By
Bartolomeo Sorrentino <bartolomeo...@...>
·
#663
·
|
|
Re: cassandra with ldap authentication
Is this line in CQLStoreManager the only change? If so, you could change it to use Java reflection to lookup the Cluster class by name since DseCluster extends Cluster, then there wouldn't be a
Is this line in CQLStoreManager the only change? If so, you could change it to use Java reflection to lookup the Cluster class by name since DseCluster extends Cluster, then there wouldn't be a
|
By
Jason Plurad <plu...@...>
·
#662
·
|
|
Re: cassandra with ldap authentication
I'm not a lawyer either, but this seems to end the discussion: without the right to re-distribute to any third party
If the solution to use LDAP with DSE is a simple jar swap and some additional
I'm not a lawyer either, but this seems to end the discussion: without the right to re-distribute to any third party
If the solution to use LDAP with DSE is a simple jar swap and some additional
|
By
Jason Plurad <plu...@...>
·
#661
·
|
|
Re: cassandra with ldap authentication
I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
The DSE license appears to be incompatible with Apache 2.0 and hence, likely ineligible to be included in JanusGraph by default. I'm happy to check in
I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
The DSE license appears to be incompatible with Apache 2.0 and hence, likely ineligible to be included in JanusGraph by default. I'm happy to check in
|
By
Misha Brukman <mbru...@...>
·
#665
·
|
|
Re: cassandra with ldap authentication
Here it is: https://www.datastax.com/terms/datastax-dse-driver-license-terms
Found it via the DataStax Enterprise Java driver webpage.
We'd need to do some more homework/legal review on the
Here it is: https://www.datastax.com/terms/datastax-dse-driver-license-terms
Found it via the DataStax Enterprise Java driver webpage.
We'd need to do some more homework/legal review on the
|
By
Jason Plurad <plu...@...>
·
#660
·
|
|
Re: cassandra with ldap authentication
What's the license on that driver?
What's the license on that driver?
|
By
Jason Plurad <plu...@...>
·
#659
·
|
|
cassandra with ldap authentication
I need to use janusgraph with cassandra using ldap authentication
This is supported by dse-java-driver-core but not by cassandra-driver-core.
I've experimented substitution in my own fork without
I need to use janusgraph with cassandra using ldap authentication
This is supported by dse-java-driver-core but not by cassandra-driver-core.
I've experimented substitution in my own fork without
|
By
Bartolomeo Sorrentino <bartolomeo...@...>
·
#658
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.1 release
+1. Thanks for all your work on this Jason!
+1. Thanks for all your work on this Jason!
|
By
sjudeng <sju...@...>
·
#657
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.1 release
Also note that the docs website does not have the 0.2.1 documentation published yet because the PR is not yet approved.
You can review the documentation via the docs zip file on the 0.2.1 release page
Also note that the docs website does not have the 0.2.1 documentation published yet because the PR is not yet approved.
You can review the documentation via the docs zip file on the 0.2.1 release page
|
By
Jason Plurad <plu...@...>
·
#656
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Release planning v0.2.1
Voting thread for 0.2.1 is open: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/janusgraph-dev/ZUREZTqERFE
I've just duplicated the information here if somebody didn't see that thread.
Voting thread for 0.2.1 is open: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/janusgraph-dev/ZUREZTqERFE
I've just duplicated the information here if somebody didn't see that thread.
|
By
Alexandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#655
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.1 release
All are welcome to review and vote on the release, but only votes from TSC members are binding.
All are welcome to review and vote on the release, but only votes from TSC members are binding.
|
By
Jason Plurad <plu...@...>
·
#654
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.1 release
I don't know if only a committer's vote counts. If other votes counts also then my vote is +1
I don't know if only a committer's vote counts. If other votes counts also then my vote is +1
|
By
Alexandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#653
·
|
|
[VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.1 release
Hello,
We are happy to announce that JanusGraph 0.2.1 is ready for release.
The release artifacts can be found at this location:
https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/tag/v0.2.1
A
Hello,
We are happy to announce that JanusGraph 0.2.1 is ready for release.
The release artifacts can be found at this location:
https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/tag/v0.2.1
A
|
By
Jason Plurad <plu...@...>
·
#652
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Release planning v0.3.0
PR 998 is now merged. Thank you!
I opened Issue 1159 today regarding Guava errors with Spark clusters. Spark and OLAP works with spark.master=local[*] since it only uses jars from the JanusGraph
PR 998 is now merged. Thank you!
I opened Issue 1159 today regarding Guava errors with Spark clusters. Spark and OLAP works with spark.master=local[*] since it only uses jars from the JanusGraph
|
By
Jason Plurad <plu...@...>
·
#651
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Release planning v0.2.1
I've merged all approved PRs for 0.2.1, then I've moved the remaining open PRs over to 0.2.2 milestone.
PR 1160 is submitted with the final version updates to move from snapshot to release.
I've merged all approved PRs for 0.2.1, then I've moved the remaining open PRs over to 0.2.2 milestone.
PR 1160 is submitted with the final version updates to move from snapshot to release.
|
By
Jason Plurad <plu...@...>
·
#650
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Release planning v0.2.1
Jason,
These PRs have enough approvals to be merged in 0.2.1:
https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/1126
https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/1135
Could you please merge them before
Jason,
These PRs have enough approvals to be merged in 0.2.1:
https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/1126
https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/1135
Could you please merge them before
|
By
Alexandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#649
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Release planning v0.2.1
Thank you!
I've checked #1141 it's LGTM but I am not a committer.
There is also a dependent PR for #1046 (as Jason noticed): https://github.com/JanusGraph/docs.janusgraph.org/pull/27
I've checked it.
Thank you!
I've checked #1141 it's LGTM but I am not a committer.
There is also a dependent PR for #1046 (as Jason noticed): https://github.com/JanusGraph/docs.janusgraph.org/pull/27
I've checked it.
|
By
Alexandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#648
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Release planning v0.2.1
I took a pass through all open PRs and approved where possible. I'll defer any actual merges to you Jason in case the consensus/preference is to push any to a later release for stability or other
I took a pass through all open PRs and approved where possible. I'll defer any actual merges to you Jason in case the consensus/preference is to push any to a later release for stability or other
|
By
sjudeng <sju...@...>
·
#647
·
|
|
Why is rexindexing for a new index that is restricted to a new vertex label required?
The docs describe when a reindex operation is necessary:
However, I'm wondering why this requirement also applies to cases where the index has a vertex label restriction and where the vertex label was
The docs describe when a reindex operation is necessary:
However, I'm wondering why this requirement also applies to cases where the index has a vertex label restriction and where the vertex label was
|
By
Florian Hockmann <f...@...>
·
#646
·
|