get composite index one by one is too slowly , I want a batch interface for speed up composite index query , will you add this ?

Pull Requests which need review 2018-10-31: PR-1238 PR-1282 PR-1286 PR-1289 PR-1294

Hello, you should ask such questions here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/janusgraph-users Regards, Alexandr

I also want to get some design document of JG, if you have got some ,please share to us, thanks in advance.

do you happen to have some sort of design document which might make it easier to understand the overall architecture or some modules of janusgraph? for example, how does it store property key, what

Per my understanding, TinkerPop expects all GLVs across all variants to be aligned as much as possible. But since the same holds true for TinkerPop, doesn't mean it has to hold true for JanusGraph

That seems a bit clear now @Florian. So out master branch is going to be build from latest TP and hence becomes JanusGraph. So in this case, it will be TP 3.4/JG 0.4.0. Whereas for legacy

This vote is now closed with a total of 8 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (3 -- Jason Plurad, Jerry He, Alex Patrikalakis) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (5 --

Hi Jason, I known from a different project which generated classes. These are generated during a extra build task. This allows to have the test class source, but prevent such problems as different

+1 on releasing 0.2.2

Jan, thanks for digging into this. In the #2 option, you mentioned that "All test classes need to be exists for all backends. An idea to write all of theses classes would be to auto generate these

Good question. I'd say we would simply release a version 0.2.0 that supports JanusGraph 0.4 versions. Then, we'd have to decide whether we want to keep supporting JG 0.3 or not. In case we decide that

Going over all the points, and looking at your SO posts, looks like there isn't much input. Wondering over your suggesting of starting from 0.1.0 is starting to feel more and more appropiate, and

I talked briefly with Jan about this after he created his WIP PR and recommended to ask here on the list before refactoring basically the whole test suite of JanusGraph for recommendations on how to

Thanks to all that have voted so far. The current tally is 7 +1s, no 0s, and no -1s. Binding (2): Jason Plurad, Jerry He Non-Binding (5): Alexandr Porunov, Florian Hockmann, Chris Human, Jan Jansen,

Any idea when this is going to get a release?

+1 LGTM.

+1 Downloaded the binary zip. Checked the signature. Good. Unzip it. Looked at the directories and files. Good. Ran simple transactions and queries against HBase 1.2.6 and Solr 6.3.0.

One last note regarding the initial version: I just had a short discussion with Jan Jansen (aka farodin91) about this and he mentioned that an initial version should not be 0.0.1, but 0.1.0 as 0.0.1

+1 Von: janusgr...@... <janus...@...> im Auftrag von Chris Hupman <chri...@...> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Oktober 2018 05:57:27 An: JanusGraph developers Betreff: Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.2.2 release