janusgraph-dev@lists.lfaidata.foundation

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups Calendar

Messages

Between

and

I agree with you that the CLA process takes too long right now and scares away some possible contributors which is really problematic. The only problem I see with these tools is that they all only

By Florian Hockmann <f...@...> · #996 ·

Re: CLA signing automation

Florian, I believe we can move with 3rd party CLA bot now because there is no any news from LF. There are contributors who would like to contribute, but CLA verification is taking too much time to

By Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...> · #995 ·

Re: [NOTE] If they are flaky, please mark them as flaky!

Being able to mark individual tests as flaky is really nice as we don't have to repeat the whole build job any more now! It also makes it easier to spot the flaky tests so we can inspect them to see

By Florian Hockmann <f...@...> · #994 ·

Re: [DISCUSS] Automated DCO enforcement via bot

Awesome! Thanks Jason and Florian for getting this added.

By Chris Hupman <chris...@...> · #993 ·

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding static code analysis into our review process

Thank you Florian for integrating DCO and code analysis!

By Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...> · #992 ·

Re: [DISCUSS] Adding static code analysis into our review process

We now have Codacy activated for all repos in the JanusGraph organization. The dashboard for the main repo can be found here: https://app.codacy.com/project/JanusGraph/janusgraph/dashboard Codacy

By Florian Hockmann <f...@...> · #991 ·

[NOTE] If they are flaky, please mark them as flaky!

Hi I added a feature to mark flaky tests in the commit https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/commit/adeaa980d736a0837a33ee33628e1eb7b70b50c1. How to mark test as flaky?

By Jan Jansen <faro...@...> · #990 ·

Re: [DISCUSS] Automated DCO enforcement via bot

We now have the DCO bot activated. This pull request that was submitted today already contains a successful check. So, it looks like we don't have to manually check every commit manually any more to

By Florian Hockmann <f...@...> · #989 ·

Re: CLA signing automation

Jason, thank you for submitting the PR. Also reporting that wangzheng90 from github sent a CLA. Related PR-1456. Misha, could you please add necessary permissions to Jason?

By Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...> · #988 ·

Re: CLA signing automation

I've submitted a PR for the ICLA. Regarding adding other committers to the CLA Google Group, it doesn't appear that I have authority to do that, only Misha. I've noticed that I can't see the CLA

By Jason Plurad <plu...@...> · #987 ·

Re: CLA signing automation

I agree. If there is no response, we should go with 3rd party CLA bot.

By Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...> · #986 ·

Re: [VOTE] Removing support for backends that are EOL

Next time I'll start such a VOTE, I will include an end date directly in the opening post, 72h like we do for releases should be enough usually. But yes, I think it's safe to say that the VOTE is

By Florian Hockmann <f...@...> · #985 ·

Re: CLA signing automation

From my side, no. The Linux Foundation directed me to two members of the Kubernetes community who I contacted, but haven't heard back from them. @Misha: Were you more successful? If we don't hear

By Florian Hockmann <f...@...> · #984 ·

Re: CLA signing automation

I've noticed that it is already about 1 month has gone when `mad` from github send a CLA. Is there any news about including him into janusgraph/legal? Next PRs are stuck because of

By Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...> · #983 ·

Re: VOTE: Issues clean-up

+1 thanks for taking the initiative on this, Chris. FWIW, I don't think this would require a vote at all. I think the project would encourage anybody, committer or otherwise, to help triage the queue.

By Jason Plurad <plu...@...> · #982 ·

Re: [VOTE] Removing support for backends that are EOL

I believe you can submit PR anyway. If any members have objections they can ask them here or in the PR.

By Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...> · #981 ·

Re: [VOTE] Removing support for backends that are EOL

+1 makes sense to me

By Jason Plurad <plu...@...> · #980 ·

Re: JanusGraph query will Obtain redundant 1 degree data

Please ask these types of questions in jausgraph-users. If it turns out to be a bug, an issue can be opened. This group is for discussing development direction, not troubleshooting.

By Chris Hupman <chris...@...> · #979 ·

Re: [VOTE] Removing support for backends that are EOL

I've had to restart the solr 5 test twice today and most weeks I generally have to restart it at least once. we have +1's from 1 TSC member and 3 commiters. Do you all think I'm good to submit a PR

By Chris Hupman <chris...@...> · #978 ·

JanusGraph query will Obtain redundant 1 degree data

I have a query `g.V().has("USERID","userid","007").properties()`, but the properties and edges of vertex are all stored in table edgestore, so programs need to query edgestore and get every property

By deng ziming <dengzim...@...> · #977 ·

621 - 640 of 1612

Home Hashtags Subgroups Calendar Terms