|
[MEETUP] JanusGraph Community Online Meetup March 27
Hello,
I would like to announce the first online JanusGraph community meetup. We have
a great lineup of sessions that will be given by JanusGraph project members
and other community users. You'll find
Hello,
I would like to announce the first online JanusGraph community meetup. We have
a great lineup of sessions that will be given by JanusGraph project members
and other community users. You'll find
|
By
Ted Wilmes <twi...@...>
·
#1006
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 0.2.3 release and 0.3 branch
Florian, can you setup a date for starting preparations for 0.2.3 release?
Florian, can you setup a date for starting preparations for 0.2.3 release?
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#1004
·
|
|
Re: JanusGraph online meetup
Hi Ted,
I am learning JanusGraph for a project I am currently working on. After a while I realized that I needed a graph database for my particular problem and JanusGraph seemed like the best option
Hi Ted,
I am learning JanusGraph for a project I am currently working on. After a while I realized that I needed a graph database for my particular problem and JanusGraph seemed like the best option
|
By
Michael Kaiser-Cross <mkaise...@...>
·
#1002
·
|
|
Re: JanusGraph online meetup
Hi Ted,
I am interested for the meetup.
Thanks,
Abhay
Hi Ted,
I am interested for the meetup.
Thanks,
Abhay
|
By
Abhay Pandit <abha...@...>
·
#1003
·
|
|
Re: JanusGraph online meetup
Hi Mark-
Thank you for setting this up. I would love to attend as well.
I'd like to upvote the Janusgraph Loading, specifically bulk loading. :) I'm currently working on a project using
Hi Mark-
Thank you for setting this up. I would love to attend as well.
I'd like to upvote the Janusgraph Loading, specifically bulk loading. :) I'm currently working on a project using
|
By
Nancy Greer <nancy...@...>
·
#1001
·
|
|
new contribution - production-worthy in-memory backend with no external dependencies
Hi JanusGraph team,
We would like to contribute an improved implementation of in-memory backend for JanusGraph.
Background/Rationale
There are many possible applications for both embedded and
Hi JanusGraph team,
We would like to contribute an improved implementation of in-memory backend for JanusGraph.
Background/Rationale
There are many possible applications for both embedded and
|
By
Dmitry Kovalev <dk.g...@...>
·
#1000
·
|
|
Re: DynamoDB storage backend
Hello
Are you intending on creating the adapter for Janusgraph 3.0 / DynamoDB?
Thanks
Chris
Hello
Are you intending on creating the adapter for Janusgraph 3.0 / DynamoDB?
Thanks
Chris
|
By
crs...@...
·
#999
·
|
|
Re: CLA signing automation
Asking to check CLAs for the next contributors:
- VladimirBogomolov
- wangzheng90
Asking to check CLAs for the next contributors:
- VladimirBogomolov
- wangzheng90
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#998
·
|
|
Re: CLA signing automation
Thanks for pointing to this problem. I didn't think about CCLAs before. We need to investigate it.
Thanks for pointing to this problem. I didn't think about CCLAs before. We need to investigate it.
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#997
·
|
|
Re: CLA signing automation
I agree with you that the CLA process takes too long right now and scares away some possible contributors which is really problematic.
The only problem I see with these tools is that they all only
I agree with you that the CLA process takes too long right now and scares away some possible contributors which is really problematic.
The only problem I see with these tools is that they all only
|
By
Florian Hockmann <f...@...>
·
#996
·
|
|
Re: CLA signing automation
Florian, I believe we can move with 3rd party CLA bot now because there is no any news from LF.
There are contributors who would like to contribute, but CLA verification is taking too much time to
Florian, I believe we can move with 3rd party CLA bot now because there is no any news from LF.
There are contributors who would like to contribute, but CLA verification is taking too much time to
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#995
·
|
|
Re: [NOTE] If they are flaky, please mark them as flaky!
Being able to mark individual tests as flaky is really nice as we don't have to repeat the whole build job any more now! It also makes it easier to spot the flaky tests so we can inspect them to see
Being able to mark individual tests as flaky is really nice as we don't have to repeat the whole build job any more now! It also makes it easier to spot the flaky tests so we can inspect them to see
|
By
Florian Hockmann <f...@...>
·
#994
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Automated DCO enforcement via bot
Awesome! Thanks Jason and Florian for getting this added.
Awesome! Thanks Jason and Florian for getting this added.
|
By
Chris Hupman <chris...@...>
·
#993
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Adding static code analysis into our review process
Thank you Florian for integrating DCO and code analysis!
Thank you Florian for integrating DCO and code analysis!
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#992
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Adding static code analysis into our review process
We now have Codacy activated for all repos in the JanusGraph organization. The dashboard for the main repo can be found here:
https://app.codacy.com/project/JanusGraph/janusgraph/dashboard
Codacy
We now have Codacy activated for all repos in the JanusGraph organization. The dashboard for the main repo can be found here:
https://app.codacy.com/project/JanusGraph/janusgraph/dashboard
Codacy
|
By
Florian Hockmann <f...@...>
·
#991
·
|
|
[NOTE] If they are flaky, please mark them as flaky!
Hi
I added a feature to mark flaky tests in the commit https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/commit/adeaa980d736a0837a33ee33628e1eb7b70b50c1.
How to mark test as flaky?
Hi
I added a feature to mark flaky tests in the commit https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/commit/adeaa980d736a0837a33ee33628e1eb7b70b50c1.
How to mark test as flaky?
|
By
Jan Jansen <faro...@...>
·
#990
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Automated DCO enforcement via bot
We now have the DCO bot activated. This pull request that was submitted today already contains a successful check. So, it looks like we don't have to manually check every commit manually any more to
We now have the DCO bot activated. This pull request that was submitted today already contains a successful check. So, it looks like we don't have to manually check every commit manually any more to
|
By
Florian Hockmann <f...@...>
·
#989
·
|
|
Re: CLA signing automation
Jason, thank you for submitting the PR.
Also reporting that wangzheng90 from github sent a CLA. Related PR-1456.
Misha, could you please add necessary permissions to Jason?
Jason, thank you for submitting the PR.
Also reporting that wangzheng90 from github sent a CLA. Related PR-1456.
Misha, could you please add necessary permissions to Jason?
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#988
·
|
|
Re: CLA signing automation
I've submitted a PR for the ICLA.
Regarding adding other committers to the CLA Google Group, it doesn't appear that I have authority to do that, only Misha.
I've noticed that I can't see the CLA
I've submitted a PR for the ICLA.
Regarding adding other committers to the CLA Google Group, it doesn't appear that I have authority to do that, only Misha.
I've noticed that I can't see the CLA
|
By
Jason Plurad <plu...@...>
·
#987
·
|
|
Re: CLA signing automation
I agree. If there is no response, we should go with 3rd party CLA bot.
I agree. If there is no response, we should go with 3rd party CLA bot.
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
·
#986
·
|