|
Change of our branching strategy
Hi,
in case you haven’t noticed already: We have recently changed our branching strategy. Instead of letting PRs target a branch like v0.6 and then merge the PR first into v0.6 and afterwards
Hi,
in case you haven’t noticed already: We have recently changed our branching strategy. Instead of letting PRs target a branch like v0.6 and then merge the PR first into v0.6 and afterwards
|
By
Florian Hockmann
·
#1603
·
|
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] JanusGraph 1.0.0 RC1
Thanks, Oleksandr. I saw that PR when I composed the list but thought that #3022 already included the important changes. But sure, then we should also include #3327 for the next announcement.
Thanks, Oleksandr. I saw that PR when I composed the list but thought that #3022 already included the important changes. But sure, then we should also include #3327 for the next announcement.
|
By
Florian Hockmann
·
#1602
·
|
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] JanusGraph 1.0.0 RC1
Thank you Florian for starting this topic.
For future announcements:
In addition to possibility to remove composite index entries there was added possibility to remove mixed index entries in #3327
So
Thank you Florian for starting this topic.
For future announcements:
In addition to possibility to remove composite index entries there was added possibility to remove mixed index entries in #3327
So
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov
·
#1601
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Release snapshot versions on each commit
Related discussion regarding publishing with `org.janusgraph` or `org.janusgraph.commit` groupId: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/discussions/3374
Related discussion regarding publishing with `org.janusgraph` or `org.janusgraph.commit` groupId: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/discussions/3374
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov
·
#1600
·
|
|
[ANNOUNCE] JanusGraph 1.0.0 RC1
The JanusGraph Technical Steering Committee is excited to announce JanusGraph 1.0.0 RC1, the first release candidate of the upcoming 1.0.0 release.
JanusGraph is an Apache TinkerPop enabled property
The JanusGraph Technical Steering Committee is excited to announce JanusGraph 1.0.0 RC1, the first release candidate of the upcoming 1.0.0 release.
JanusGraph is an Apache TinkerPop enabled property
|
By
Florian Hockmann
·
#1599
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Release snapshot versions on each commit
Related PR for reference: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/3364
Related PR for reference: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/3364
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov
·
#1598
·
Edited
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0.0 / 0.6.3 Releases
Yes, I like that idea. Let's publish rc1 sooner and release `1.0.0` or `0.7.0` in January depending on what we decide.
As for snapshot releases I will go ahead and prepare some PR and we can discuss
Yes, I like that idea. Let's publish rc1 sooner and release `1.0.0` or `0.7.0` in January depending on what we decide.
As for snapshot releases I will go ahead and prepare some PR and we can discuss
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov
·
#1597
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] Release snapshot versions on each commit
Thanks for bumping this thread again in the discussion for the 1.0.0 release, Oleksandr!
> Basically, I think it's possible to configure different publishing flows (either to sonatype for official
Thanks for bumping this thread again in the discussion for the 1.0.0 release, Oleksandr!
> Basically, I think it's possible to configure different publishing flows (either to sonatype for official
|
By
Florian Hockmann
·
#1596
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0.0 / 0.6.3 Releases
My intention here is that we try to release from master soon-ish, like in January ideally. We have features on master that were implemented about a year ago already and some dependency updates that
My intention here is that we try to release from master soon-ish, like in January ideally. We have features on master that were implemented about a year ago already and some dependency updates that
|
By
Florian Hockmann
·
#1595
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0.0 / 0.6.3 Releases
You are right that these breaking changes regarding ElasticSearch side will be affecting only those users who want to switch using ElasticSearch 8. Users On ElasticSearch 6 and 7 won't be
You are right that these breaking changes regarding ElasticSearch side will be affecting only those users who want to switch using ElasticSearch 8. Users On ElasticSearch 6 and 7 won't be
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov
·
#1594
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0.0 / 0.6.3 Releases
Elasticsearch 8 is of course a good point. But do we need to support that directly in 1.0.0? Elasticsearch 7.17 seems to be still supported roughly until 9.0.0 gets released if I understood their EoL
Elasticsearch 8 is of course a good point. But do we need to support that directly in 1.0.0? Elasticsearch 7.17 seems to be still supported roughly until 9.0.0 gets released if I understood their EoL
|
By
Florian Hockmann
·
#1593
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0.0 / 0.6.3 Releases
Hi,
Upgrade to ElasticSearch 8 will be a breaking change in regarding to Geoshape properties because we won't have Prefix Tree indexing strategy anymore. Users will need to do migration of any indexes
Hi,
Upgrade to ElasticSearch 8 will be a breaking change in regarding to Geoshape properties because we won't have Prefix Tree indexing strategy anymore. Users will need to do migration of any indexes
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov
·
#1592
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0.0 / 0.6.3 Releases
Yes, a release candidate probably makes sense for the 1.0.0 release. I think we don’t need a formal voting process for a release candidate. So, if there are no objections, I start preparing such a
Yes, a release candidate probably makes sense for the 1.0.0 release. I think we don’t need a formal voting process for a release candidate. So, if there are no objections, I start preparing such a
|
By
Florian Hockmann
·
#1591
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0.0 / 0.6.3 Releases
That sounds really awesome! Just one thought:
Shall we do a RC release (e.g. 1.0.0 RC1) before the official 1.0.0 release? There are quite some breaking and major changes in 1.0.0, and I feel we
That sounds really awesome! Just one thought:
Shall we do a RC release (e.g. 1.0.0 RC1) before the official 1.0.0 release? There are quite some breaking and major changes in 1.0.0, and I feel we
|
By
Boxuan Li
·
#1590
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0.0 / 0.6.3 Releases
Hi Dustin,
sure, that will be included. I should have mentioned that probably:
0.6.3 will include all issues / PRs tagged with the 0.6.3
Hi Dustin,
sure, that will be included. I should have mentioned that probably:
0.6.3 will include all issues / PRs tagged with the 0.6.3
|
By
Florian Hockmann
·
#1589
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0.0 / 0.6.3 Releases
Hi Florian,
Would this release contain the commits in this PR - https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/2904?
v/r
Dustin
Hi Florian,
Would this release contain the commits in this PR - https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/2904?
v/r
Dustin
|
By
dustinwaguespack@...
·
#1588
·
|
|
[DISCUSS] 1.0.0 / 0.6.3 Releases
Hi,
I would like to start a discussion about our next release(s) as there were multiple requests from the community already.
Our last release (0.6.2) was also already half a year ago (May 31) and
Hi,
I would like to start a discussion about our next release(s) as there were multiple requests from the community already.
Our last release (0.6.2) was also already half a year ago (May 31) and
|
By
Florian Hockmann
·
#1587
·
|
|
Re: [DISCUSSION] JanusGraph db-cache in distributed environment
Thanks for starting this thread! Just want to mention there is an open PR for Redis cache integration: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/3100
Thanks for starting this thread! Just want to mention there is an open PR for Redis cache integration: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/3100
|
By
Boxuan Li
·
#1586
·
|
|
[DISCUSSION] JanusGraph db-cache in distributed environment
Hello,
I would like to start a topic about JanusGraph db-cache we have today and ways to improve it for distributed environments.
I want to split this topic on several issues I see with this cache:
1)
Hello,
I would like to start a topic about JanusGraph db-cache we have today and ways to improve it for distributed environments.
I want to split this topic on several issues I see with this cache:
1)
|
By
Oleksandr Porunov
·
#1585
·
|
|
LF AI&Data JanusGraph Project License Scan and Findings August 2022
Hi Team,
Here are the results from the August 2022 license scan of the JanusGraph project. The scan was performed using the Linux Foundation Fossology server. Licenses and copyrights were
Hi Team,
Here are the results from the August 2022 license scan of the JanusGraph project. The scan was performed using the Linux Foundation Fossology server. Licenses and copyrights were
|
By
Jeff Shapiro <jshapiro@...>
·
#1584
·
|