Hello, We are happy to announce that JanusGraph 0.4.0 is ready for release. The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/tag/v0.4.0 A

I also think that we need some policy but it is hard to say right now where should this "enhancement" go. Some improvements cannot go to older branches and some can. For example, it could be a storage

Hello, I didn't research much, but I think we could try to enable some platform which will work to collect money contributions which we can spent on some expenses. I didn't research much how it works

+1 If there are folks in the community that want continued support for old/non-supported versions of backend dependencies, we would need those same folks to step up to help managing those maintenance

I'm fine with adding labels for features and breaking changes, but where I'm not sure about is this part: Who decides here which branch to target? The contributor? Any reviewer? I think we should have

Ah, fair enough, enhancement makes sense when explained more fully by example.

I would also add dropping of Cassandra 2 support (including Thrift). These feature set sounds good for me to be integrate into JanusGraph 0.5. The update of TinkerPop 3.4.2 could be integrate also

Hi everyone, 0.2.3 and 0.3.2 are released and 0.4.0 is going to be released soon. I would like to add a new feature "Add support for ElasticSearch 7". The feature makes a small breaking changes, that

If an issue suggests a performance improvement, can we label it as a "bugfix"?

I think "enhancement" can be easily confused with "feature". I'd suggest to stick with "bugfix" for items that would go into any branch.

Hello, Currently both new features and enhancements are labeled as "enhancement". I am proposing to introduce new labels: - "feature" - a new functionality - "breaking changes" - breaking

Hello, bumping this thread again to see if any folks have something JanusGraph related they'd enjoy presenting. Last time we had great talks on the state of JanusGraph, a new approach to JanusGraph

Hello, Has anyone tried to run OLAP queries on HDP 3.1, using HBase 2x with YARN? I managed to succesfully run JanusGraph on HBase 2.0.2, but I am not able to run queries using SparkGraphComputer,

Hey Chris, there are currently only two open PRs left for the 0.4.0 release and I think that we should really release 0.4.0 as soon as possible, considering how long it has been since the last release

Hey Florian, I was looking at the changelog for Tinkerpop 3.4.2 and saw a couple of improvements that look really nice. Do you think it would be possible to update to TinkerPop 3.4.2 in JanusGraph

Vladamir Expero, the company I work with specializes in many types of JanusGraph work. Here is a link if that assists LINK: https://www.experoinc.com/resource/janusgraph Regards Scott Heath |

Hello, It might not be appropriate but I'm looking for help in a way of hiring an expert who could help create GraphDB structure, Gremlin Scripts to fetch data and establish a connection so we can

This vote is now closed with a total of 4 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are: BINDING VOTES: +1 (3 -- Florian Hockmann, Jason Plurad, Jerry He) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (1 --

+1 Thanks for the work, Oleksandr. Jerry

We have 3 +1 votes, however we have only 2 +1 votes from TSC members, which falls short of the 3 required for the release. Oleksandr Porunov Florian Hockmann * Jason Plurad * * denotes TSC member I'm