Thanks, Dmitry. Please allow us some time for the review. Quick question, there are bunch of TODO in the PR, do you plan to address it soon or is it currently trade-off between time and initial

I find inline comments from Codacy convenient. Of course it would be much better if those comments would be grouped in a single review rather then separate comments but frankly, most PRs are much

I got a response from them that they forwarded that request to their product team. Not sure if everyone here is aware of this, but you can also adjust your personal notification settings on GitHub to

Just a gentle reminder - please could anyone spare some time to review? Thank you, Dmitry

I will bet a few pints that when it comes to actually reviewing that big PR by a human, both reviewer and author will also find that having 100 comments from a bot on the PR is as annoying as having

After getting over 100 emails in the past 2 days on the janusgraph-python PR, I must admit I am much more sympathetic to Dmitry's complaint about email spam from in-line comments. The email spam is

Here is the link: https://zoom.us/j/231802964

Is there a way to access the meetup link, without providing addevent access to my calendar?

Misha, Jason, Could you please check if VladimirBogomolov signed a CLA? Looks like he signed it 19 days ago but the CLA PR wasn't been submitted to janusgraph-legal repository

That sounds like a good idea for an improvement. I didn't find any option to configure how Codacy adds these inline comments, so I submitted that as a feature request to them. (I have no idea though

[ bcc: janusgraph-dev ] No trouble at all, Chris! You're on the invite.

I'm definitely on the side of wanting as much automation for PR reviews as we can. As for the number of emails is it possible to configure Codacy to do a single review instead of a review comment per

Hey Misha, If it's not too much trouble I'd be interested in joining the call. Regards, Chris

Misha, I really love to hear that! I am happy that there are progress in the CLA automation direction. Hope it will be implemented soon.

In emailing help...@... to open a ticket (which I believe was the process in the past?), I've learned that (a) Linux Foundation no longer supports that email address, and (b) they are now using Jira

But for that, the reviewer has to open the Codacy report in a separate windows and then correlate which issue affects which part of the contribution while reviewing that. To be honest, I wouldn't do

Florian, It is great news! I really happy to hear that! Waiting for the bot :)

I just asked in the issue I linked above whether it will be possible for us to use the CLA bot of the Linux Foundation and got a very promising response from Dan Kohn: The gRPC project will beta test

Hi Florian, On the examples of "stale" codacy-bot issues not being deleted/resolve automatically - please have a look at the PR I mentioned below. The ones which are manually resolved by me are fixed

Thanks for your feedback on this, Dmitry! Are you sure about that? Could you provide examples? I'm only asking because I haven't seen this behaviour yet, but it may of course be possible that I just