JanusGraph is translated to Russian and Ukrainian languages: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/JanusGraph https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/JanusGraph

I don't get what you mean with this. How can the latest minor version be 1.1.1? Minor version just means the second element of the version number which would be '2' in the version 1.2.3. My proposal

Hi Florian, Okay, thanks for pointing that out, and I do see few issues with my idea, as in inde[endently bumping major and minor versions of clients by itself without upgrade to JanusGraph is

I think JanusGraph 0.2.2 can be released for voting already. I think that PR 1273 has to go into 0.3.1 also.

Update: Added JanusGraph into the list of notable graph databases: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_database

+1 on using the bot for these checks. Am Sonntag, 23. September 2018 03:47:44 UTC+2 schrieb Misha Brukman:

Thanks for getting the discussion on this topic started! One disadvantage I see with your proposal is that those version numbers imply semantic versioning but they prevent the libraries from making

Update:JanusGraph article was created in the main space. The link is the next now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JanusGraph

HBase is strong consistency (as compared to eventual consistency). I agree the chapter is confusing. What it says is that because the backends lack multiple row transaction consistency (for both

Hi All, A few days back, Florian had started a Discuss thread regarding how should we version the upcoming GLV libraries for Python and DotNet. After discussions and lazy consensus it felt like we

Agree with you. I also think that PR 1230 is a good enhancement for 0.3.1.

Quick update on releases. I had a conversion with Chris Jackson who is working on PR 1230. He's wrapping up work today to address the final review comments, and I think it would be a good enhancement

The policy is encoded in the JanusGraph project charter; see section 8 "Intellectual property policy", part (b): paragraph (i) requires a CLA paragraph (ii) requires DCO sign-off in addition to the

Are both the CLA and DCO required for Linux Foundation contributors? It'd be a lot easier if we only needed one or the other.

Hi all, Right now, the only bot-automated enforcement is the CLA signature, but not the Developer Certificate of Origin, which is a requirement of The Linux Foundation. This is a bit of a pain to do

Thank you for additional information about the logo. I've updated this information on the Wikipedia page. About JanusGrapg users. I think it depends on the reviewer. I see here that HBase included

Is it worth mentioning some examples of software powered by JanusGraph: https://github.com/janusgraph/janusgraph/#powered-by-janusgraph or customers using JanusGraph in

A couple months ago, I set a rough target date for September 15 for these milestones in an effort to move towards more frequent releases. These would both be maintenance fix releases -- meaning no

Hi Misha, Awesome! Thanks for your work on these issues. I will add some comments on github. Best regards, Alexandr Porunov

Hi Alexandr, Excellent points! Agreed (I've also gotten this feedback separately); I have a draft in-progress here: https://mbrukman.github.io/janusgraph.org/ and this is being tracked via