Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
Hi Jan,
I think that it isn't a big problem that current release is 2 times bigger than past releases. Of course we can try to ship also truncated releases but it looks more like a new feature. We actually can add a truncated opinion to all current JanusGraph releases but I think we need to discuss it in a separate thread. I don't think we should postpone the release because of its size (0.5 GB) but if you think that it is a problem and we should also add a truncated option to this release, I am OK with it.
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
Hi Nicolas. This isn't a release specific warning but ES specific. You may find the same warning with JanusGraph 0.3.x, 0.4.x versions.
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
Jan Jansen <faro...@...>
We could think of adding a smaller release bundle without janusgraph.sh, cassandra and elasticsearch. For the current release, we could try to run elasticsearch with default jdk. It shouldn't be any problem. This will postpone the release. I'm currently working on testing hadoop changes. Greetings, Jan
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
nicolas...@...
Hi, I found how to fix the warning "the default number of shards will change from [5] to [1] in 7.0.0" with the option index.search.elasticsearch.create.ext.number_of_shards documentated at https://docs.janusgraph.org/master/index-backend/elasticsearch/. As this option is not documentated at https://docs.janusgraph.org/master/basics/configuration-reference/, I will try do a merge request to fix it, this week.
Le mardi 17 mars 2020 11:27:44 UTC+1, Nicolas Trangosi a écrit :
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
nicolas...@...
Hi, I have tested the release using cassandra 3.0.17 and elasticsearch 6.8.6. I have been able to use a graph loaded with janusGraph 0.4.1. I have also created a new graph with about 800 000 vertices and same number of edges. I have some deprecation messages that appears when I create the elastic search index:
I have not found how to prevent such warnings. My vote is +1 Kind regards, Nicolas
Le vendredi 13 mars 2020 21:18:21 UTC+1, Oleksandr Porunov a écrit :
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
Thank you Ted for the review of the release! Yes, I also noticed that now jdk is included into elasticsearch. This change was made in the next commit: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/commit/c16f5c28c859f1ab209e344a1a83ee4f07038c8f Before that commit we were executing assembly tests against ElasticSearch 6.2.4 After that commit we changed the behavior and now we are executing assembly tests against ElasticSearch {elasticsearch.version} (which is 7.6.1 right now). ES 7.x depends on java 13, so I assume that is why they included openjdk 13 into the elasticsearch 7.x releases. I am not sure if we can exclude jdk 13 from the distribution now. I think it should be there now to work with newer ES releases. But this dependency is only for distribution. It isn't populated into maven, so I guess it is OK.
On Friday, March 13, 2020 at 9:18:15 AM UTC-7, Ted Wilmes wrote:
Thanks for leading this release Oleksandr!
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
Ted Wilmes <twi...@...>
Thanks for leading this release Oleksandr!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I downloaded 0.5.0 and noticed the zip is quite large. It looks like there is a jdk that got bundled under Elasticsearch: 20M janusgraph-0.5.0/elasticsearch/bin 273M janusgraph-0.5.0/elasticsearch/jdk 153M janusgraph-0.5.0/elasticsearch/modules 40K janusgraph-0.5.0/elasticsearch/config 4.0K janusgraph-0.5.0/elasticsearch/plugins 35M janusgraph-0.5.0/elasticsearch/lib 479M janusgraph-0.5.0/elasticsearch Here's the 0.4.1 Elasticsearch directory: 260K janusgraph-0.4.1-hadoop2/elasticsearch/bin 8.5M janusgraph-0.4.1-hadoop2/elasticsearch/modules 20K janusgraph-0.4.1-hadoop2/elasticsearch/config 4.0K janusgraph-0.4.1-hadoop2/elasticsearch/plugins 22M janusgraph-0.4.1-hadoop2/elasticsearch/lib 31M janusgraph-0.4.1-hadoop2/elasticsearch Thanks, Ted
On Thursday, March 12, 2020 at 1:32:36 PM UTC-5, Oleksandr Porunov wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
I want to say that the release is targeting the latest commit: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/commit/c01bfea2ce602696163aa50fde9be1cdeea13fc1 The release has been tested with following steps: 1) All TinkerPop tests passed using `mvn clean install -Dtest.skip.tp=false -DskipTests=true` 2) TravisCI build passed: https://travis-ci.org/github/JanusGraph/janusgraph/builds/661377366 3) Custom full build passed also: https://travis-ci.org/github/porunov/janusgraph/builds/661374484 4) Custom integrationTests passed for the release (ScyllaDB + ElasticSearch)
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 10:49:25 PM UTC-7, Oleksandr Porunov wrote:
|
|
[VOTE] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
Hello, We are happy to announce that JanusGraph 0.5.0 is ready for release. The release artifacts can be found at this location: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/tag/v0.5.0 A binary distribution is provided for user convenience: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/download/v0.5.0/janusgraph-0.5.0.zip The GPG key used to sign the release artifacts is available at: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/download/v0.5.0/KEYS The docs can be found here: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/releases/download/v0.5.0/janusgraph-0.5.0-doc.zip The release tag in Git can be found here: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/tree/v0.5.0 The release notes are available here: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/blob/master/docs/changelog.md#version-050-release-date-march-10-2020 This [VOTE] will open for the next 3 days --- closing Saturday, March 15, 2020 at 06:00 AM GMT. All are welcome to review and vote on the release, but only votes from TSC members are binding. My vote is +1. Thank you, Oleksandr Porunov
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
Yes, would you be able to include it?
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:10 PM 'Jan Jansen' via JanusGraph developers <janusgr...@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
Jan Jansen <faro...@...>
Okay. Should we include the refactoring of hadoop in the notable feature list. Am Mittwoch, 11. März 2020 22:46:47 UTC+1 schrieb Oleksandr Porunov:
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
I would like to release 0.5.0 before creating a new branch and bumping it to 0.6.0-SNAPSHOT. Currently I am trying to fix release process which is broken in 0.5.0 release. We didn't shade some dependency correctly, so some of our jars are broken. I fixed it, but I still experiencing some errors during releasing. I will try to fix those problems asap
On Wednesday, March 11, 2020 at 2:42:00 PM UTC-7, Jan Jansen wrote:
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
Jan Jansen <faro...@...>
Do you like to create a new branch and bump snapshot version to 0.6.0-SNAPSHOT? Am Dienstag, 10. März 2020 05:35:07 UTC+1 schrieb Oleksandr Porunov:
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] JanusGraph 0.5.0 release
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
v0.5.0 release PR: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/2034
On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 3:01:49 AM UTC-8, Jan Jansen wrote:
|
|
Re: Interests in a transactional scale-out graph store backend for JanusGraph?
Dmitry Kovalev <dk.g...@...>
Hi Gene, just curious - any news on this project? Any github links to share? Thank you, Dmitry
On Wednesday, 28 August 2019 17:21:14 UTC+1, Gene Z wrote:
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Removal of janusgraph-codepipelines-ci and coverity scans
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
+1 for removing those tools. Currently they don't add any benefit to JanusGraph but add only some inconvenience (i.e. they are distracting)
On Monday, March 2, 2020 at 12:24:44 PM UTC-8, Jan Jansen wrote:
|
|
Re: High Severity Bug related meta properties - When trying to load graph , meta properties are not being set on vertex properties , bug found , it required fix for this blocker
Florian Hockmann <f...@...>
The developer list is only meant to discuss development of JanusGraph and not to report a bug or suggest a feature. You already created an issue for this in our issue tracker: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/issues/1996 so you don't have to repeat this here again. To copy what I wrote on Gitter where you also tried to bump this:
|
|
High Severity Bug related meta properties - When trying to load graph , meta properties are not being set on vertex properties , bug found , it required fix for this blocker
Ramesh Babu Y <ramesh...@...>
For complete details of high severity bug , please below the link of details
|
|
[DISCUSS] Removal of janusgraph-codepipelines-ci and coverity scans
Jan Jansen <faro...@...>
Hello The JanusGraph repo have two tools which aren't used for a long time. I'm proposing to delete these tools. Both tools could be broken and also the main repo should be clean as possible. * janusgraph-codepipelines-ci a tool to run JanusGraph tests inside aws. We are currently in state where we can ran the most tests inside Travis. * coverity some static analysis which also done by Codacy What do you think? Greetings, Jan
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Revamp JanusGraph Management
Jan Jansen <faro...@...>
+1 One of my major concerns is to make JanusGraph more modular.
|
|