[janusgraph-foundationdb] - New Release
jackson.christopher.lee@...
Hi all,
I think we should consider doing a release of the janusgraph-foundationdb adapter sometime soon. There have been several changes since the initial 0.1.0 release that warrant a new release. I would like to understand if others agree and also discuss a timeline for when such a release would be done?
I've had several people complain that the release is outdated and that its difficult to get started easily since there isn't a pre-built binary that can be downloaded and consumed for people looking to adopt the adapter.
Thanks in advance, Chris Jackson
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Thread appears as read after a new reply is posted
I also now find groups.io to be not as good experience as Google Groups.
1) As noted by Marc, there is no way to see on UI that there are threads with new messages you didn't see. Here is the issue for that: https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/topic/30886089 2) We found out that emails with numbers only in prefix (till `@`) are banned in groups.io . I.e. and email 12345<at>example.com cannot subscribe to groups.io This is disappointing. I will raise those issues to see what options we have Best regards, Oleksandr Porunov
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Thread appears as read after a new reply is posted
Hi Marc,
> 1. After a new reply appears to a thread, the thread still appears as "read" in the web ui. In other words, you have to open every thread to see whether new replies are present. That's really strange. I will check try to check if there is a possibility to change this behavior in groups.io > 2. There is no possibility to start a thread on the web ui. This feels inconsistent because it *is* possible to do a reply in the web ui. You can go to https://lists.lfaidata.foundation/g/janusgraph-users/ and clock `New Topic` to create a new thread in the web ui but I think you should join the group to do so. I will check if there are sope configurations we can do in groups.io to improve this experience. You should fine `New Topic` button on the left side of the screen as shown below: If you know any configurations we could do in groups.io to improve this experience, let us know and we will change those configurations. We can also contact LF AI & Data foundation to resolve these issues Best regards, Oleksandr Porunov
|
|
[DISCUSS] Thread appears as read after a new reply is posted
HadoopMarc <m.c.delignie@...>
Hi all,
After using the new mail lists through the web ui for a while, there are two aspects that are particularly annoying: 1. After a new reply appears to a thread, the thread still appears as "read" in the web ui. In other words, you have to open every thread to see whether new replies are present. 2. There is no possibility to start a thread on the web ui. This feels inconsistent because it *is* possible to do a reply in the web ui. I know, you can get those replies by e-mail, but can anyone advice about a webmail client that has the feel of the old Google groups? I certainly do not want to clutter my usual e-mail account + client with janusgraph posts. Best wishes, Marc
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Monthly Video Calls/Office Hours
Jansen, Jan
I think it would be just okay to have a monthly repeating meeting. Do we also want to use a google document to keep notes?
|
|
Re: Option for "reply to sender" is too prominent
The default option is now `Reply to Group`
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Monthly Video Calls/Office Hours
As we are now under LF AI & Data, we can ask for Zoom account for regular JanusGraph meetings.
|
|
Option for "reply to sender" is too prominent
Hi Marc,
It definitely makes sense to prioritize "Group Reply". I requested John Mertic to change the default option to `Group Reply`. I'm also voting +1 to remove the option `Reply to Sender`. Best regards, Oleksandr Porunov
|
|
Option for "reply to sender" is too prominent
Marc de Lignie <m.c.delignie@...>
The new mailing list stimulates users to use the option "reply to sender". This means that discussions between OP and expert become invisible to other users. It also means that experts cannot answer from the webpage but have to use their e-mail client to give answers.
I would prefer to remove the option "reply to sender" or at least stop making it the default option. What do you think? Best wishes, Marc
|
|
Re: mixed index - Reindex is very slow
hadoopmarc@...
The janusgraph user forum was moved to:
https://lists.lfaidata.foundation/g/janusgraph-users You have to fill an e-mail address and acknowledge a request sent to that address. Regarding the code lines of the mapreduce index:
As far as I know this runs on your local machine and all dependencies are present in the JanusGraph distribution. In other words, no need for an hadoop or spark cluster for this. Cheers, Marc
|
|
Re: mixed index - Reindex is very slow
hadoopmarc@...
janusgraph-dev is for discussion on internal implementation details of JanusGraph itself. Questions about using JanusGraph, installation, configuration, and integrations should be posted on janusgraph-users. First-time posts are moderated and may not be visible immediately.
Could you please repost your question on janusgraph-users, so that I can copy the answer below on the right list? Did you try to use the mapreduce way of reindexing? https://docs.janusgraph.org/index-management/index-reindexing/#executing-a-reindex-job-on-mapreduce
|
|
mixed index - Reindex is very slow
vamsi.lingala@...
Hi we have imported around 4 billion vertices in janus graph.
We are using big table and elastic search reindexing speed is very slow..around 2000 records per second is there any way to speed it up?
|
|
[DISCUSS] Usage of hashtags
Jansen, Jan
Hi I would like to use special hashtag to filter for discussions, votes, releases, ctr commits, ... . Do you any idea or thoughts? Greetings, Jan Jansen
|
|
[ANNOUNCEMENT] JanusGraph joins LF AI & Data umbrella
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
On behalf of the JanusGraph Technical Steering Committee, we are excited to join LF AI & Data Foundation! We are now moving mailing lists to a new home under LF AI & Data. Mailing lists hosted on Google Groups will now be considered obsolete and will be available in read-only mode. All messages from Google Groups mailing lists will be moved to new mailing lists in the next few days. We kindly ask everyone to switch to new mailing lists:
In addition to the mailing lists, we are continuing to use the following collaboration tools, with no changes:
Best regards, Oleksandr Porunov on behalf of JanusGraph TSC
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Monthly Video Calls/Office Hours
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
Voting +1 for monthly calls
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Sunday, January 10, 2021 at 5:05:04 PM UTC+2 li...@... wrote:
|
|
Re: [DISCUSS] Monthly Video Calls/Office Hours
BO XUAN LI <libo...@...>
Absolutely agree!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
|
|
[DISCUSS] Monthly Video Calls/Office Hours
"fa...@googlemail.com" <faro...@...>
Hi
I think it would be helpful to have monthly calls, which allow us to discuss current development progress and discuss new ideas. Such calls would allow us to get more focus on pushing JanusGraph forward. From my perspective, it would also to develop a roadmap for JanusGraph, which is currently more implicit and async discussed. What do you think? Greetings, Jan
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.5.3 release
Alexander Patrikalakis <amcpatr...@...>
I checked the full binary distribution and then I ran through examples in the JanusGraph documentation. I vote +1 for this release.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
On Tuesday, January 5, 2021 at 8:35:54 PM UTC+9 Florian Hockmann wrote:
|
|
[RESULT][VOTE] JanusGraph 0.5.3 release
Oleksandr Porunov <alexand...@...>
This vote is now closed with a total of 5 +1s, no +0s and no -1s. The results are:
BINDING VOTES: +1 (3 -- Oleksandr Porunov, Jan Jansen, Florian Hockmann) 0 (0) -1 (0) NON-BINDING VOTES: +1 (Boxuan Li, Abhay) 0 (0) -1 (0) Thank you very much, Oleksandr Porunov
|
|
Re: [VOTE] JanusGraph 0.5.3 release
Florian Hockmann <f...@...>
Hi, I checked the links and downloaded the two binary distributions to run some quick manual tests. Everything looks good. VOTE +1 Regards, Florian fa...@... schrieb am Dienstag, 5. Januar 2021 um 08:46:08 UTC+1:
Hi
|
|