Hi Florian! That definitely sounds like a promising idea. You are most likely not the only one requiring consistency between storage and index data. In general, my advice is to start with a test case

If we wait for TinkerPop 3.5.0 (or 3.4.11), we can probably also release the configurable batch sizes in 0.6.0 which should bring a noticable performance gain if used properly. Kind regards, Florian

Hi Saurabh! Thanks for reporting that issue! Looking at the open pull requests, I don't see one that addresses this problem. You're always welcome to share your solutions by discussing them here or ev

Sounds like a good thing to do. We should consider updating our documentation (#54) before that, so that users who get started with the new release don't experience any issues regarding installation a