1. Messages
  2. JanusGraph release roadmap

Re: JanusGraph release roadmap

Ted Wilmes <twi...@...>
 

Rajdeep,
Alternatively, you could evaluate moving away from running JanusGraph embedded.  As you know, we don't have a release yet, but when 0.1.0 releases, it'll be on at least Apache TinkerPop 3.2.3.  TinkerPop 3.2 added some pretty excellent new functionalities from a driver perspective including Gremlin language variants and the ability to connect to a remote graph.  The remote graph feature in your particular use case would give you the embedded feel (not having to send query strings via the driver) but allow you to run a separate Janus server, isolating yourself from the Janus dependencies.  You can see some more remote graph[1] and GLV[2] details in the TinkerPop docs.  Not sure if this would be feasible for you but it may be worth looking at.

--Ted

[1] http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.3/reference/#connecting-via-remotegraph
[2] http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.2.3/reference/#gremlin-variants


On Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 9:06:51 AM UTC-5, Jason Plurad wrote:
The Scala dependency is defined via Apache TinkerPop. JanusGraph is aligned currently with the TinkerPop 3.2.x branch, which is using Scala 2.10.5 (and Spark 1.6.1). Scala 2.11 (and Spark 2.0.2) is coming with TinkerPop 3.3, but there isn't a schedule in place for that yet.

I'm not aware if anybody has attempted to build JanusGraph against TinkerPop master branch, but I imagine there would be some work involved for any breaking changes.


On Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at 8:30:15 AM UTC-4, rajdeep.singh wrote:
Ted,
    We are using Scala 2.11.8 in our project but Janusgraph build uses scala 2.10.(6?) libraries. We are wondering if there is near future release (perhaps through maven) with scala 2.11? If not, wondering if you already tried that and faced some issues. We are facing compatability issues in using libraries specific to scala 2.11 such as logging when we try to use an older (several years old in fact) version of scala 2.10.6?

Thanks!
Raj

On Thursday, February 23, 2017 at 8:22:04 AM UTC-8, Ted Wilmes wrote:
Definitely.  We're not quite there but getting close: https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/issues/40.

--Ted

On Wednesday, February 22, 2017 at 9:22:28 AM UTC-6, Manas Bajaj wrote:
Ted - Thanks for the response and the link. It would be best if the team starts posting snapshot zips that can be used. 

On Tuesday, February 21, 2017 at 8:46:52 AM UTC-5, Ted Wilmes wrote:
Hello,
A tentative date has not been set yet.  There has been some discussion on the dev list.
There are a number of prerequisites that we're working through.  For now, I'd recommend
watching the dev list as discussions continue.  You can also track progress of the issues that
are slated to be included by looking at https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/milestone/1.
That's not necessarily a complete or final list but it should give you some insight along with
the dev chatter.

Thanks,
Ted

On Monday, February 20, 2017 at 8:16:29 PM UTC-6, 吴冉波 wrote:
Want too ~~~~
And hope to make ElasticSearch to be the new storage backend.

On Monday, February 20, 2017 at 10:22:54 AM UTC+8, Manas Bajaj wrote:
Hello JanusGraph committers

We are all very excited to see JanusGraph kickoff in 2017. Is there a release roadmap for this project? What will be the first release and tentatively when?

Thanks
Manas
Join janusgraph-users@lists.lfaidata.foundation to automatically receive all group messages.