Your instruction gets a very long way to getting things moving with MANAGED dependencies.

But I get the following unresolved dependency. I think my resolvers are right. I'm wondering if the semicolon should be a colon in your dependencies, or if it should be jBCrypt-0.4 instead of jbcrypt-0.4 (case difference). On the github site for JBCrypt, the module name is camelcase. 

sbt.ResolveException: unresolved dependency: com.github.jeremyh#jBCrypt;jbcrypt-0.4: not found
[error] Total time: 2 s, completed Apr 22, 2017 8:20:02 AM
jlawson@tortie:~/workspace/idsvc$ sbt compile
[info] Loading global plugins from /home/jlawson/.sbt/0.13/plugins
[info] Loading project definition from /home/jlawson/workspace/idsvc/project
[info] Set current project to idsvc (in build file:/home/jlawson/workspace/idsvc/)
[info] Updating {file:/home/jlawson/workspace/idsvc/}idsvc...
[info] Resolving com.github.jeremyh#jBCrypt;jbcrypt-0.4 ...
[warn] module not found: com.github.jeremyh#jBCrypt;jbcrypt-0.4
[warn] ==== local: tried
[warn]   /home/jlawson/.ivy2/local/com.github.jeremyh/jBCrypt/jbcrypt-0.4/ivys/ivy.xml
[warn] ==== public: tried
[warn]   https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/github/jeremyh/jBCrypt/jbcrypt-0.4/jBCrypt-jbcrypt-0.4.pom
[warn] ==== Artima Maven Repository: tried
[warn]   http://repo.artima.com/releases/com/github/jeremyh/jBCrypt/jbcrypt-0.4/jBCrypt-jbcrypt-0.4.pom
[info] Resolving org.fusesource.jansi#jansi;1.4 ...
[warn] ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
[warn] ::          UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES         ::
[warn] ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
[warn] :: com.github.jeremyh#jBCrypt;jbcrypt-0.4: not found
[warn] ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
[warn]
[warn] Note: Unresolved dependencies path:
[warn] com.github.jeremyh:jBCrypt:jbcrypt-0.4
[warn]  +- org.apache.tinkerpop:gremlin-groovy:3.2.3
[warn]  +- org.janusgraph:janusgraph-core:0.1.0 (/home/jlawson/workspace/idsvc/build.sbt#L55-56)
[warn]  +- default:idsvc_2.10:1.0

On Saturday, April 22, 2017 at 7:58:32 AM UTC-7, Jamie Lawson wrote:

That's a giant step forward!!!

On Friday, April 21, 2017 at 11:48:37 PM UTC-7, HadoopMarc wrote:

Hi Jamie,

Your last line is almost OK, you have to specify the individual modules as with most large software suites. Start with janusgraph-core and see what deps you still miss. Listing from maven central:

../
janusgraph/                                                      -         -      
janusgraph-all/                                                  -         -      
janusgraph-berkeleyje/                                           -         -      
janusgraph-cassandra/                                            -         -      
janusgraph-core/                                                 -         -      
janusgraph-es/                                                   -         -      
janusgraph-hadoop/                                               -         -      
janusgraph-hadoop-2/                                             -         -      
janusgraph-hadoop-core/                                          -         -      
janusgraph-hadoop-parent/                                        -         -      
janusgraph-hbase/                                                -         -      
janusgraph-hbase-parent/                                         -         -      
janusgraph-lucene/                                               -         -      
janusgraph-solr/                                                 -         -      
janusgraph-test/                                                 -         -      
		

Cheers,    Marc


Op zaterdag 22 april 2017 06:28:09 UTC+2 schreef Jamie Lawson:

I've been using the nasty method of building JanusGraph and copying all of jars from the janusgraph/lib directory into the myproject/lib directory. That is, myproject has more than 200 unmanaged dependencies. This has some obvious issues. One is that SBT gives me this unpleasant error message:

[error] SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings.
[error] SLF4J: Found binding in [jar:file:/home/jlawson/workspace/myproject/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.7.12.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
[error] SLF4J: Found binding in [jar:file:/home/jlawson/workspace/myproject/lib/logback-classic-1.1.2.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
[error] SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings for an explanation.
[error] SLF4J: Actual binding is of type [org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerFactory]

This seems, with high assurance, to be a consequence of the unmanaged dependencies. It also seems that when I remove the slf4j jar file from the JanusGraph stuff, it changes the behavior of the logger dramatically. There is a whole bunch of other log output that I don't want or need to see. So when will I just be able to include a line in my SBT file that says something like:

libraryDependencies += "org.janusgraph" % "janusgraph" % "0.1.0"

And let SBT deal with all of the cross-dependencies?

Short of that, how do I get SLF4J to play nicely?