No, it is not a bug. It is a warning letting you know that there is a query that is doing a global scan of all vertices. In this case, the specific call is `g.V().count().next()` which is trying to determine whether there is any data in the graph. Something like `g.V().hasNext()` would be a less expensive check, although it would still issue the warning.

This small example can get away a call like this because there are only 12 vertices in the loaded graph, but it would be an expensive operation if there were 1 billion vertices.

Thanks for the feedback.
-- Jason