Have you tried keeping query.batch = true AND query.fast-property = true?

Regards,

Boxuan

On Mar 22, 2021, at 8:28 PM, Vinayak Bali <vinayakbali16@...> wrote:

Hi All,

Adding these properties in the configuration file affects edge traversal. Retrieving a single edge takes 7 mins of time. 

1) Turn on query.batch
2) Turn off query.fast-property

Count query is faster but edge traversal becomes more expensive.

Is there any other way to improve count performance without affecting other queries.

Thanks & Regards,

Vinayak

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 1:53 AM AMIYA KUMAR SAHOO <amiyakr.sahoo91@...> wrote:

Hi Vinayak,

Try below. If it works for you, you can add E2 and D similarly.

g.V().has('property1', 'A').
   outE().has('property1', 'E').as('e').

   inV().has('property1', 'B').

   outE().has('property1', 'E1').as('e').

   where (inV().has('property1', 'C')).

 select (all, 'e').fold().

    project('edgeCount', 'vertexCount').

            by(count(local)).

        by(unfold().bothV().dedup().count())

Regards,

Amiya

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021, 15:47 Vinayak Bali, <vinayakbali16@...> wrote:

Amiya - I need to check the data, there is some mismatch with the counts.

Consider we have more than one relation to get the count. How can we modify the query?

For example:

 

A->E->B query is as follows:

g.V().has('property1', 'A').
   outE().has('property1','E').
       where(inV().has('property1', 'B')). fold().
   project('edgeCount', 'vertexCount').

            by(count(local)).

            by(unfold().bothV().dedup().count())

A->E->B->E1->C->E2->D

What changes can be made in the query ??

Thanks

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 1:59 PM AMIYA KUMAR SAHOO <amiyakr.sahoo91@...> wrote:

Hi Vinayak,

Correct vertex count is ( 400332 non-unique, 34693 unique).

g.V().has('property1', 'A').aggregate('v'), all the vertex having property1 = A  might be getting included in count in your second query because of eager evaluation (does not matter they  have outE with property1 = E or not)

Regards,
Amiya