|
Re: Traversal binding of dynamically created graphs are not propagated in multi-node cluster
Hi Anton,
No, my last post only concerned the gremlin server on port 8185, although the
first line of step3 should have been (This was a hand edit error):
:remote connect tinkerpop.server
Hi Anton,
No, my last post only concerned the gremlin server on port 8185, although the
first line of step3 should have been (This was a hand edit error):
:remote connect tinkerpop.server
|
By
hadoopmarc@...
·
#5797
·
|
|
Re: Traversal binding of dynamically created graphs are not propagated in multi-node cluster
Hi Mark,
I'm glad that you managed to reproduce it in the Gremlin Console. But I believe that in fact you do it with two JanusGraph servers, not with a single server as you assumed. As far as I
Hi Mark,
I'm glad that you managed to reproduce it in the Gremlin Console. But I believe that in fact you do it with two JanusGraph servers, not with a single server as you assumed. As far as I
|
By
Anton Eroshenko <erosh.anton@...>
·
#5796
·
|
|
Re: Count Query Optimization
Hi All,
query.batch = true AND query.fast-property = true
this doesn't work. facing the same problem. Is there any other way??
Thanks & Regards,
Vinayak
Hi All,
query.batch = true AND query.fast-property = true
this doesn't work. facing the same problem. Is there any other way??
Thanks & Regards,
Vinayak
|
By
Vinayak Bali
·
#5795
·
|
|
Re: Traversal binding of dynamically created graphs are not propagated in multi-node cluster
You could also check the scenario at line 65
You could also check the scenario at line 65
|
By
hadoopmarc@...
·
#5794
·
|
|
Re: Traversal binding of dynamically created graphs are not propagated in multi-node cluster
Hi Anton,
OK, it took me some time to reach your level of understanding, but hopefully the
scenario below really starts adding to our common understanding. While the
issue hurts you in a setup with
Hi Anton,
OK, it took me some time to reach your level of understanding, but hopefully the
scenario below really starts adding to our common understanding. While the
issue hurts you in a setup with
|
By
hadoopmarc@...
·
#5793
·
|
|
Re: Poor performance for some simple queries - bigtable/hbase
Hi,
> 1. Is this behavior expected, or it's just bigtable or hbase that might have this issue?
This (very likely) is not related to bigtable/hbase, but JanusGraph itself.
> 2. What is the expected
Hi,
> 1. Is this behavior expected, or it's just bigtable or hbase that might have this issue?
This (very likely) is not related to bigtable/hbase, but JanusGraph itself.
> 2. What is the expected
|
By
Boxuan Li
·
#5792
·
|
|
Poor performance for some simple queries - bigtable/hbase
Hi,
We are running janusgraph on GCP with bigtable as the backend. I have observed some query behavior that really confuses me. Basically, I am guessing batch fetching from the backend is not
Hi,
We are running janusgraph on GCP with bigtable as the backend. I have observed some query behavior that really confuses me. Basically, I am guessing batch fetching from the backend is not
|
By
liqingtaobkd@...
·
#5791
·
|
|
Re: Janusgraph 0.5.3 potential memory leak
FYI: we recently pushed a bug fix https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/2536 which might be related to the problem you encountered. This will be released in 0.6.0.
FYI: we recently pushed a bug fix https://github.com/JanusGraph/janusgraph/pull/2536 which might be related to the problem you encountered. This will be released in 0.6.0.
|
By
Boxuan Li
·
#5790
·
|
|
Re: Traversal binding of dynamically created graphs are not propagated in multi-node cluster
Marc, thanks for your help.
The way you test it is similar to how it works in my environment. I do ConfiguredGraphFactory.open("graph1") as a workaround for the second JanusGraph instance.
But the
Marc, thanks for your help.
The way you test it is similar to how it works in my environment. I do ConfiguredGraphFactory.open("graph1") as a workaround for the second JanusGraph instance.
But the
|
By
Anton Eroshenko <erosh.anton@...>
·
#5789
·
|
|
Re: Traversal binding of dynamically created graphs are not propagated in multi-node cluster
Hi Anton,
I did not feel like debugging your docker-compose file, but I could not find any test covering your scenario on github/janusgraph either, so I just replayed your scenario with the default
Hi Anton,
I did not feel like debugging your docker-compose file, but I could not find any test covering your scenario on github/janusgraph either, so I just replayed your scenario with the default
|
By
hadoopmarc@...
·
#5788
·
|
|
Re: Traversal binding of dynamically created graphs are not propagated in multi-node cluster
Hi Marc,
The environment properties in docker-compose are making it work with scylla as a backend storage and with ConfiguredGraphFactory for dynamically created graphs. It works as expected except
Hi Marc,
The environment properties in docker-compose are making it work with scylla as a backend storage and with ConfiguredGraphFactory for dynamically created graphs. It works as expected except
|
By
Anton Eroshenko <erosh.anton@...>
·
#5787
·
|
|
Re: Janusgraph 0.5.3 potential memory leak
After rolling back the PR I mentioned in the beginning of the topic we do not experience any issues. Even back then it was not "out of memory", but the process just ate one full core of CPU and never
After rolling back the PR I mentioned in the beginning of the topic we do not experience any issues. Even back then it was not "out of memory", but the process just ate one full core of CPU and never
|
By
sergeymetallic@...
·
#5786
·
|
|
Re: Janusgraph 0.5.3 potential memory leak
After understanding more about the context, I feel https://gist.github.com/mad/df729c6a27a7ed224820cdd27209bade is not a fair comparison between iterator and iterable versions because it assumes all
After understanding more about the context, I feel https://gist.github.com/mad/df729c6a27a7ed224820cdd27209bade is not a fair comparison between iterator and iterable versions because it assumes all
|
By
Boxuan Li
·
#5785
·
|
|
Re: Traversal binding of dynamically created graphs are not propagated in multi-node cluster
Hi Anton,
If I do a $ docker run janusgraph/janusgraph:latest
the logs show it runs with the berkeleyje backend.
If I look
Hi Anton,
If I do a $ docker run janusgraph/janusgraph:latest
the logs show it runs with the berkeleyje backend.
If I look
|
By
hadoopmarc@...
·
#5784
·
|
|
Re: Janusgraph 0.5.3 potential memory leak
Can someone share how you run the benchmark (like what JMH version and what janusgraph version you are using) provided by @mad? I ran the benchmark on master (f19df6) but I see OOM errors for both
Can someone share how you run the benchmark (like what JMH version and what janusgraph version you are using) provided by @mad? I ran the benchmark on master (f19df6) but I see OOM errors for both
|
By
Boxuan Li
·
#5783
·
|
|
Re: Duplicate Vertex
I couldn't reproduce this on the v0.4 branch using the below code:
@Test
public void testTopic81433493() {
PropertyKey prop1 = mgmt.makePropertyKey("prop1").dataType(String.class).make();
I couldn't reproduce this on the v0.4 branch using the below code:
@Test
public void testTopic81433493() {
PropertyKey prop1 = mgmt.makePropertyKey("prop1").dataType(String.class).make();
|
By
Boxuan Li
·
#5782
·
|
|
Traversal binding of dynamically created graphs are not propagated in multi-node cluster
Hi
We use dynamically created graphs in a multi-node JanusGraph cluster. With a single JunusGraph node it seems to work, but when we are using more than one, synchronization between JanusGraph nodes
Hi
We use dynamically created graphs in a multi-node JanusGraph cluster. With a single JunusGraph node it seems to work, but when we are using more than one, synchronization between JanusGraph nodes
|
By
Anton Eroshenko <erosh.anton@...>
·
#5781
·
|
|
Re: Query not returning always the same result
Hi Adrian,
What happens if you rewrite the query to:
lmg.traversal().V(analysisVertex).out().emit().repeat(
__.in().choose(
__.hasLabel("result"),
Hi Adrian,
What happens if you rewrite the query to:
lmg.traversal().V(analysisVertex).out().emit().repeat(
__.in().choose(
__.hasLabel("result"),
|
By
hadoopmarc@...
·
#5780
·
|
|
Query not returning always the same result
Hello,
I'm having a strange behaviour with janusgraph and I would like to post it here and see if anyone can give me some help.
The thing is that I'm doing a tree query for getting my graph data
Hello,
I'm having a strange behaviour with janusgraph and I would like to post it here and see if anyone can give me some help.
The thing is that I'm doing a tree query for getting my graph data
|
By
Adrián Abalde Méndez <aabalde@...>
·
#5779
·
|
|
Re: Multiple vertices generated for the same index value and vertex properties missing with RF3
Hi,
You did not answer my questions about the "id" poperty. TinkerPop uses a Token.ID that has the value 'id',
Hi,
You did not answer my questions about the "id" poperty. TinkerPop uses a Token.ID that has the value 'id',
|
By
hadoopmarc@...
·
#5778
·
|