Hi Boxuan Li, Hope this helps: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vertex Index Name | Type | Unique | Backing

Hi, can you share more details (what indexes do you have related to prop1 and/or prop2), or even minimal code to reproduce?

Hello We are on Janus 0.4.0 and faced one scenario wherein there were duplicate vertices created. These 2 vertices were created in span of 9 milliseconds within single transaction. We are using index

Thanks for your thoughts. 1) I'm very interested to try out the PR you made for this issue. 2) I don't think the solution you gave me in that previous thread solves the issue. What if another user

Amiya - I need to check the data, there is some mismatch with the counts. Consider we have more than one relation to get the count. How can we modify the query? For example: A->E->B query is as

Hi Vinayak, Correct vertex count is ( 400332 non-unique, 34693 unique). g.V().has('property1', 'A').aggregate('v'), all the vertex having property1 = A might be getting included in count in your

Hi Amiya, With dedup: g.V().has('property1', 'A'). outE().has('property1','E'). where(inV().has('property1', 'B')). fold(). project('edgeCount', 'vertexCount').

Hi Vinayak, May be try below. g.V().has('property1', 'A'). outE().has('property1','E'). where(inV().has('property1', 'B')). fold(). project('edgeCount', 'vertexCount').

Hi Claire! Would you mind sharing the pom.xml file for your build? I'm trying a similar build for AWS and am hitting a mess of dependency errors. Thank you :) Ben

Hi Srinivas, In the yaml file determining class Settings you use the channelizer key twice. If you use ConfigurationManagentGraph only the following line should be present: channelizer:

Hi Vinayak, Another attempt, this one is very similar to the one that works. gremlin> graph =

Hi, You may try to use denormalization by setting property1 from inV also on edge. Then once edges are updated, following query should work: g.V().has('property1',

Hi Marc, Using local returns the output after each count. For

Hi Marc, As per your info closed all instances other than current one.still if i restart server it is throwing same instance error. as per logs there are

Hi Vinayak, Referring to you last post, what happens if you use aggregate(local, 'v') and aggregate(local, 'e'). The local modifier makes the aggregate() step lazy, which hopefully gives janusgraph

Hi All, The solution from BO XUAN LI to change config files worked for the following query: g.V().has('property1', 'A').as('v1').outE().has('property1','E').as('e').inV().has('property1',

Hi, Because TinkerPop and JanusGraph do not ship with spark-yarn, all kinds of library conflict can occur when you start using spark-yarn. Since my blog from some years ago, where it was possible to

Hi Srinivas, No, you would not want to close the current instance, because it would close you out from further commands. This current instance will close automatically when exiting the gremlin

Hi Mark, I tried that one Before.Unable to Close current instance and the instanceid is not same as that in error.please check below logs. gremlin> mgmt =

Hi Srinavas, OK, I guess I was not clear enough. The line with JanusGraphFactory should run locally in the gremlin console. This implies that you have to run gremlin console on the server host, or