|
Log4j Vulnerability for janusgraph
Hi, Try updating the jar file, I mean deleting the earlier one and placing the new one in lib folder. There might be some other changes required not sure. I was working with janusgraph before not shif
Hi, Try updating the jar file, I mean deleting the earlier one and placing the new one in lib folder. There might be some other changes required not sure. I was working with janusgraph before not shif
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #6494
·
|
|
Log4j Vulnerability for janusgraph
Hi Nidhi, I have faced the same problem. Log4j previous versions have vulnerability and security threats. But the good part is those issues were addressed in latest versions. Using the latest version
Hi Nidhi, I have faced the same problem. Log4j previous versions have vulnerability and security threats. But the good part is those issues were addressed in latest versions. Using the latest version
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #6490
·
|
|
Query Generation
Hi All, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69454519/generating-efficient-count-query-in-gremlin-for-multiple-scenarios Request you to check the problem posted on StackOverflow and share your feedback
Hi All, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/69454519/generating-efficient-count-query-in-gremlin-for-multiple-scenarios Request you to check the problem posted on StackOverflow and share your feedback
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #6192
·
|
|
Performance Improvement
Hi Oleksandr, Thank you for the detailed explanation, regarding the configuration and indexes. I will dig deeper into it and try to resolve the problem. But I think the queries which I am executing ar
Hi Oleksandr, Thank you for the detailed explanation, regarding the configuration and indexes. I will dig deeper into it and try to resolve the problem. But I think the queries which I am executing ar
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #6187
·
|
|
Performance Improvement
Hi All, Updated the Janusgraph version to 0.6.0 and added the parallel execution queries in the configuration files as suggested by Oleksandr. Still, the performance is not improved. I think I am miss
Hi All, Updated the Janusgraph version to 0.6.0 and added the parallel execution queries in the configuration files as suggested by Oleksandr. Still, the performance is not improved. I think I am miss
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #6184
·
|
|
Data Loading Script Optimization
Hi Marc, To avoid confusion, including a new transaction at line number 39, as well as at line no 121. Line 39: GraphTraversalSource g = graph.newTransaction().traversal(); Line 121: g = ctx.g = graph
Hi Marc, To avoid confusion, including a new transaction at line number 39, as well as at line no 121. Line 39: GraphTraversalSource g = graph.newTransaction().traversal(); Line 121: g = ctx.g = graph
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #6075
·
|
|
Data Loading Script Optimization
Hi Marc, The storage backend used is Cassandra. Yes, storage backend janusgraph and load scripts are on the same server. specified storage.batch-loading=true CPU usage is very low not more than 3 perc
Hi Marc, The storage backend used is Cassandra. Yes, storage backend janusgraph and load scripts are on the same server. specified storage.batch-loading=true CPU usage is very low not more than 3 perc
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #6073
·
|
|
Data Loading Script Optimization
Hi All, I have attached a groovy script that I use to load data into janusgraph. The script takes 4 mins to load 1.5 million nodes and 13 mins to load approx 3 million edges. The server on which the s
Hi All, I have attached a groovy script that I use to load data into janusgraph. The script takes 4 mins to load 1.5 million nodes and 13 mins to load approx 3 million edges. The server on which the s
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #6068
·
|
|
Performance Improvement
Laura that is helpful, will go through it and try to implement it. Also, if there are any configurations that can be tuned for better performance, please share them.
Laura that is helpful, will go through it and try to implement it. Also, if there are any configurations that can be tuned for better performance, please share them.
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #6056
·
|
|
Performance Improvement
Hi Boxuan, Thank you for your response. I am not sure, how I can build janusgraph from the master branch. If you can share step's/procedure to do the same, I can check otherwise need to wait for the n
Hi Boxuan, Thank you for your response. I am not sure, how I can build janusgraph from the master branch. If you can share step's/procedure to do the same, I can check otherwise need to wait for the n
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #6053
·
|
|
Performance Improvement
Hi All, I am using janusgraph for a while. The use case which I am working on consists of 1.5 million nodes and 3 million edges. Prepared a batch loading groovy script. The performance of the data loa
Hi All, I am using janusgraph for a while. The use case which I am working on consists of 1.5 million nodes and 3 million edges. Prepared a batch loading groovy script. The performance of the data loa
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #6051
·
|
|
Union with Count returning unexpected results
Hi All, The objective is to count the number of nodes and edges. Query: g2.inject(1).union(V().has('title', 'A').aggregate('v1').union(outE().has('title', 'E1').aggregate('e').inV().has('title', 'B'),
Hi All, The objective is to count the number of nodes and edges. Query: g2.inject(1).union(V().has('title', 'A').aggregate('v1').union(outE().has('title', 'E1').aggregate('e').inV().has('title', 'B'),
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #5978
·
|
|
Count Query
I have gone through the commit, I think that will help. To confirm we need to test it with the master branch as it has been not released yet. Earlier, we downloaded the full version from the releases
I have gone through the commit, I think that will help. To confirm we need to test it with the master branch as it has been not released yet. Earlier, we downloaded the full version from the releases
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #5968
·
|
|
Count Query
Hi All, Please take a look at following issue and provide your feedbacks https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67908881/how-to-improve-performance-of-count-query?noredirect=1#comment120034631_67908881 T
Hi All, Please take a look at following issue and provide your feedbacks https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67908881/how-to-improve-performance-of-count-query?noredirect=1#comment120034631_67908881 T
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #5947
·
|
|
Query Optimisation
Hi Marc, I am using the following query now. g2.inject(1).union( V().has('property1', 'V1').aggregate('v1').outE().has('property1', 'E1').limit(100).aggregate('e').inV().has('property2', 'V2').aggrega
Hi Marc, I am using the following query now. g2.inject(1).union( V().has('property1', 'V1').aggregate('v1').outE().has('property1', 'E1').limit(100).aggregate('e').inV().has('property2', 'V2').aggrega
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #5915
·
|
|
Query Optimisation
Hi Marc, Thank you for your reply. I will try to report this issue on janusgraph repository. Regarding the work around you suggested, if possible please share the updated query with work around for qu
Hi Marc, Thank you for your reply. I will try to report this issue on janusgraph repository. Regarding the work around you suggested, if possible please share the updated query with work around for qu
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #5893
·
|
|
Query Optimisation
Hi Marc, This query takes 18 sec to run by changing as to aggregate and select to project. But still, 99% of the time is taken to compute union. There is no memory issue, it already set to 8g. g.injec
Hi Marc, This query takes 18 sec to run by changing as to aggregate and select to project. But still, 99% of the time is taken to compute union. There is no memory issue, it already set to 8g. g.injec
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #5891
·
|
|
Query Optimisation
Hi Marc, That works as expected. Union also works as expected as in Query1 but when I add limit to all edge the performance degrades. Thanks
Hi Marc, That works as expected. Union also works as expected as in Query1 but when I add limit to all edge the performance degrades. Thanks
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #5889
·
|
|
Query Optimisation
Hi Marc, Yes, all the index are made available and no warning is thrown while executing the query. I tried debugging using profile step. 99% of time is taken by the union query. Thanks & Regards, Vina
Hi Marc, Yes, all the index are made available and no warning is thrown while executing the query. I tried debugging using profile step. 99% of time is taken by the union query. Thanks & Regards, Vina
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #5887
·
|
|
Query Optimisation
Hi Marc, Tried the approach you suggested. There is some improvement. Earlier it took 2 mins, now it's taking 1min 50sec. Is there any other way to optimize this further may to ms or seconds?? Thank &
Hi Marc, Tried the approach you suggested. There is some improvement. Earlier it took 2 mins, now it's taking 1min 50sec. Is there any other way to optimize this further may to ms or seconds?? Thank &
|
By
Vinayak Bali
· #5885
·
|