|
sparklyr codebase license scan, Jan. 2020
Dear sparklyr technical-discuss list,
I am providing the results of a license scan of the sparklyr codebase, based on a snapshot of the repos as of January 10. Beginning this month, I am using a new
Dear sparklyr technical-discuss list,
I am providing the results of a license scan of the sparklyr codebase, based on a snapshot of the repos as of January 10. Beginning this month, I am using a new
|
By
Steve Winslow <swinslow@...>
·
#1
·
|
|
Re: sparklyr codebase license scan, Jan. 2020
Makes sense, we will do our best to address those in the next release. Tracked now with: https://github.com/sparklyr/sparklyr/issues/2239
Makes sense, we will do our best to address those in the next release. Tracked now with: https://github.com/sparklyr/sparklyr/issues/2239
|
By
Javier Luraschi
·
#2
·
|
|
sparklyr 1.2 release discussion
sparklyr committers and public technical mailing list,
It seems like a good time to start preparing the sparklyr 1.2 release. The Spark 3.0 is feature complete and the two other major features:
sparklyr committers and public technical mailing list,
It seems like a good time to start preparing the sparklyr 1.2 release. The Spark 3.0 is feature complete and the two other major features:
|
By
Javier Luraschi
·
#3
·
|
|
Re: sparklyr 1.2 release discussion
Javier,
1-3 weeks sounds good. Probably 3 weeks is better. We are running internal QAs and having some customers beta-test the features. We expect those to wrap up within the next 15 days.
--
Hossein
Javier,
1-3 weeks sounds good. Probably 3 weeks is better. We are running internal QAs and having some customers beta-test the features. We expect those to wrap up within the next 15 days.
--
Hossein
|
By
Hossein Falaki <hossein@...>
·
#4
·
|
|
Re: sparklyr 1.2 release discussion
Hi Javier,
We can announce the new release on LF AI blog and our social media channels.
Best,
Ibrahim
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 5:59 PM, Javier Luraschi javier@... wrote:
Hi Javier,
We can announce the new release on LF AI blog and our social media channels.
Best,
Ibrahim
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 5:59 PM, Javier Luraschi javier@... wrote:
|
By
Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...>
·
#5
·
|
|
Re: sparklyr 1.2 release discussion
For a blog post and social promotion, please provide the following regarding the release: summary/highlights of the release, link to release notes, and target release date. We will need to coordinate
For a blog post and social promotion, please provide the following regarding the release: summary/highlights of the release, link to release notes, and target release date. We will need to coordinate
|
By
Jacqueline Z Cardoso
·
#6
·
|
|
Re: sparklyr 1.2 release discussion
Thank you Jacqueline and Ibrahim. Yitao will share this at least one week in advance. We also added this step to our release wiki (https://github.com/sparklyr/sparklyr/wiki/Releases) -- Best, Javier
Thank you Jacqueline and Ibrahim. Yitao will share this at least one week in advance. We also added this step to our release wiki (https://github.com/sparklyr/sparklyr/wiki/Releases) -- Best, Javier
|
By
Javier Luraschi
·
#7
·
|
|
Re: sparklyr 1.2 release discussion
This is a great release checklist, thanks for adding the announcement step. Looking forward to learning more about the release!
Thank you,
Jacqueline
Jacqueline Serafin
Program Manager
The Linux
This is a great release checklist, thanks for adding the announcement step. Looking forward to learning more about the release!
Thank you,
Jacqueline
Jacqueline Serafin
Program Manager
The Linux
|
By
Jacqueline Z Cardoso
·
#8
·
|
|
vote on sparklyr 1.2 release branch
Hello, sparklyr contributors:
Hope you are as excited about releasing sparklyr 1.2 as I am. Please take a look and vote on the following release candidate:
Hello, sparklyr contributors:
Hope you are as excited about releasing sparklyr 1.2 as I am. Please take a look and vote on the following release candidate:
|
By
Yitao Li <yitao@...>
·
#9
·
|
|
Re: vote on sparklyr 1.2 release branch
Spent some time this week testing and looking at the bulk of changes for this release. Mostly testing in Amazon EMR, Databricks and Azure with Livy which we currently don't have test coverage for in
Spent some time this week testing and looking at the bulk of changes for this release. Mostly testing in Amazon EMR, Databricks and Azure with Livy which we currently don't have test coverage for in
|
By
Javier Luraschi
·
#10
·
|
|
Re: vote on sparklyr 1.2 release branch
I believe this release is robust. I vote +1
Em qui, 16 de abr de 2020 02:25, Javier Luraschi <javier@...> escreveu:
I believe this release is robust. I vote +1
Em qui, 16 de abr de 2020 02:25, Javier Luraschi <javier@...> escreveu:
|
By
Samuel Victor Medeiros de Macedo - IFPE - Campus Recife <samuelmacedo@...>
·
#11
·
|
|
Re: vote on sparklyr 1.2 release branch
Our QA focusing on the new Databricks Connect functionality is complete and I am +1 as well.
We are hoping to get PR 2417 into the release branch after comments are addressed.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at
Our QA focusing on the new Databricks Connect functionality is complete and I am +1 as well.
We are hoping to get PR 2417 into the release branch after comments are addressed.
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at
|
By
Hossein Falaki <hossein@...>
·
#12
·
|
|
Re: sparklyr 1.3 release
+1 to kick off another release!
It's hard to read from the NEWS file but there were three major features implemented for this release:
- Support for High-order functions to help users transform fields
+1 to kick off another release!
It's hard to read from the NEWS file but there were three major features implemented for this release:
- Support for High-order functions to help users transform fields
|
By
Javier Luraschi
·
#13
·
|
|
Re: sparklyr 1.3 release
+1
--
Hossein
By
Hossein Falaki
·
#14
·
|
|
Re: sparklyr 1.3 release
Agree. +1
Em sex, 12 de jun de 2020 15:19, Hossein Falaki <hossein@...> escreveu:
Agree. +1
Em sex, 12 de jun de 2020 15:19, Hossein Falaki <hossein@...> escreveu:
|
By
Samuel Victor Medeiros de Macedo - IFPE - Campus Recife
·
#15
·
|
|
sparklyr 1.3 release
sparklyr committers and public technical mailing list,
It looks like we now have several new features (e.g., support for higher-order function, more seamless integration with Apache Avro, and more)
sparklyr committers and public technical mailing list,
It looks like we now have several new features (e.g., support for higher-order function, more seamless integration with Apache Avro, and more)
|
By
Yitao Li <yitao@...>
·
#16
·
|
|
Re: sparklyr 1.3 release
Agree +1.
Regards,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 2:55 AM Samuel Victor Medeiros de Macedo - IFPE - Campus Recife <samuelmacedo@...> wrote:
Agree +1.
Regards,
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 2:55 AM Samuel Victor Medeiros de Macedo - IFPE - Campus Recife <samuelmacedo@...> wrote:
|
By
Vipul Modi <vipulm@...>
·
#17
·
|
|
sparklyr codebase license scan, June 2020
Dear sparklyr technical-discuss list,
I am providing the results of a license scan of the sparklyr codebase, based on a snapshot of the repos as of June 1. The findings and license summary are
Dear sparklyr technical-discuss list,
I am providing the results of a license scan of the sparklyr codebase, based on a snapshot of the repos as of June 1. The findings and license summary are
|
By
Steve Winslow <swinslow@...>
·
#18
·
|
|
sparklyr 1.4 release
sparklyr committers and public technical mailing list,
A non-trivial number of new features and bug fixes have been added to sparklyr in the past 2 months. I think we should kick off the release of
sparklyr committers and public technical mailing list,
A non-trivial number of new features and bug fixes have been added to sparklyr in the past 2 months. I think we should kick off the release of
|
By
Yitao Li
·
#19
·
|
|
Re: sparklyr 1.4 release
Sounds good to me and this is an impressive list of new features!--
Hossein
Sounds good to me and this is an impressive list of new features!--
Hossein
|
By
Hossein Falaki
·
#20
·
|